Literature DB >> 11445689

Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).

E W Ely1, R Margolin, J Francis, L May, B Truman, R Dittus, T Speroff, S Gautam, G R Bernard, S K Inouye .   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an instrument for use in the intensive care unit to accurately diagnose delirium in critically ill patients who are often nonverbal because of mechanical ventilation.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: The adult medical and coronary intensive care units of a tertiary care, university-based medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight patients admitted to the intensive care units.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We designed and tested a modified version of the Confusion Assessment Method for use in intensive care unit patients and called it the CAM-ICU. Daily ratings from intensive care unit admission to hospital discharge by two study nurses and an intensivist who used the CAM-ICU were compared against the reference standard, a delirium expert who used delirium criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fourth edition). A total of 293 daily, paired evaluations were completed, with reference standard diagnoses of delirium in 42% and coma in 27% of all observations. To include only interactive patient evaluations and avoid repeat-observer bias for patients studied on multiple days, we used only the first-alert or lethargic comparison evaluation in each patient. Thirty-three of 38 patients (87%) developed delirium during their intensive care unit stay, mean duration of 4.2 +/- 1.7 days. Excluding evaluations of comatose patients because of lack of characteristic delirium features, the two critical care study nurses and intensivist demonstrated high interrater reliability for their CAM-ICU ratings with kappa statistics of 0.84, 0.79, and 0.95, respectively (p <.001). The two nurses' and intensivist's sensitivities when using the CAM-ICU compared with the reference standard were 95%, 96%, and 100%, respectively, whereas their specificities were 93%, 93%, and 89%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The CAM-ICU demonstrated excellent reliability and validity when used by nurses and physicians to identify delirium in intensive care unit patients. The CAM-ICU may be a useful instrument for both clinical and research purposes to monitor delirium in this challenging patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11445689     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  543 in total

1.  The effect of cognitive impairment on the accuracy of the presenting complaint and discharge instruction comprehension in older emergency department patients.

Authors:  Jin H Han; Suzanne N Bryce; E Wesley Ely; Sunil Kripalani; Alessandro Morandi; Ayumi Shintani; James C Jackson; Alan B Storrow; Robert S Dittus; John Schnelle
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Detecting pediatric delirium: development of a rapid observational assessment tool.

Authors:  Gabrielle Silver; Chani Traube; Julia Kearney; Daniel Kelly; Margaret J Yoon; Wendy Nash Moyal; Maalobeeka Gangopadhyay; Huibo Shao; Mary Jo Ward
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Optimizing outcomes for older patients treated in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Research issues in the evaluation of cognitive impairment in intensive care unit survivors.

Authors:  James C Jackson; Sharon M Gordon; E Wesley Ely; Candice Burger; Ramona O Hopkins
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Screening for delirium using family caregivers: convergent validity of the Family Confusion Assessment Method and interviewer-rated Confusion Assessment Method.

Authors:  Melinda R Steis; Lois Evans; Karen B Hirschman; Alexandra Hanlon; Donna M Fick; Nina Flanagan; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Delirium and sedation in the intensive care unit: survey of behaviors and attitudes of 1384 healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Rina P Patel; Meredith Gambrell; Theodore Speroff; Theresa A Scott; Brenda T Pun; Joyce Okahashi; Cayce Strength; Pratik Pandharipande; Timothy D Girard; Hayley Burgess; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Agitation, Delirium, and Cognitive Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Lisa J Rosenthal; Brandon A Francis; Jennifer L Beaumont; David Cella; Michael D Berman; Matthew B Maas; Eric M Liotta; Robert Askew; Andrew M Naidech
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.386

8.  Comparison of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for delirium in critical care patients gives high agreement rate(s).

Authors:  Konstanze Plaschke; Rebecca von Haken; Mirijam Scholz; Ria Engelhardt; Angelika Brobeil; Eike Martin; Markus A Weigand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Melatonin and Sleep in Preventing Hospitalized Delirium: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stuti J Jaiswal; Thomas J McCarthy; Nathan E Wineinger; Dae Y Kang; Janet Song; Solana Garcia; Christoffel J van Niekerk; Cathy Y Lu; Melissa Loeks; Robert L Owens
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Physiological monitoring of the severe traumatic brain injury patient in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.