Literature DB >> 25631845

Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Anna-Karina B Maier1, Enken Gundlach, Jan Schroeter, Matthias K J Klamann, Johannes Gonnermann, Aline I Riechardt, Eckart Bertelmann, Antonia M Joussen, Necip Torun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a standard procedure in patients with endothelial corneal disorders. We investigated the difficulty of unfolding and attaching the graft lamella and its correlation to characteristics of the graft lamella donor, preoperative patient characteristics, and the postoperative outcome.
METHODS: After preparation of the graft lamella, we prospectively graded the unfolding of the graft lamella in 169 consecutive DMEK procedures between September 2012 and August 2013 at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin with four different grades. Various donor characteristics and preoperative patient characteristics were analyzed and correlated to the grading. Additionally, visual acuity, corneal thickness and endothelial cell density were measured and correlated.
RESULTS: Donor characteristics (age [range, 49 - 79 years], gender, endothelial cell density, total storage time, storage de-swelling time, postmortem time) did not correlate to the grading. Preoperative visual acuity significantly influenced the grade of unfolding and attaching of the graft lamella (p = 0.023), while all other preoperative parameters (age, gender, indication for DMEK, preoperative endothelial cell density and preoperative central corneal thickness) showed no correlation. Visual acuity improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.001, preoperative 0.73 ± 0.43 LogMAR versus 0.31 ±0.28 LogMAR after one month, 0.25 ± 0.29 LogMAR after three months, and 0.21 ± 0.25 LogMAR after six months). Visual acuity did not differ significantly between the grading groups at any time point postoperatively. After 6 months, the mean loss rate of endothelial cell density was 24.7 %. Grading group IV developed significantly higher endothelial loss after one month, after three months and after six months compared to the other groups (p = 0.039, p = 0.008, p = 0.048). Graft detachment requiring an additional intracameral air injection to fix the graft detachment (re-bubbling) occurred in 61 eyes (38.1 %). In eyes graded IV, more re-bubblings were necessary than in all other groups (grade I: 37.0 %; grade II: 44.7 %; grade III: 43.8 %; grade IV: 50.0 %; p = 0.128; df = 3; χ (2) = 5.676).
CONCLUSION: There is no correlation between corneal donor tissue characteristics and the degree of difficulty of unfolding using graft lamella older than 49 years. Therefore, it is not possible to select grafts best suited for DMEK surgery on the basis of donor characteristics when the donor age is above 50 years. Preoperative visual acuity influences the grade of difficulty. The rate of graft detachments and endothelial cell loss increases significantly with a more difficult graft unfolding. The proposed grading system may therefore be relevant for postoperative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25631845     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-2939-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  15 in total

1.  Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Martin Dirisamer; Korine van Dijk; Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Oganesyan Oganes; Laurence E Frank; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-14

2.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Kyros Moutsouris; Konstantinos Droutsas; Lisanne Ham; Korine van Dijk; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01

Review 3.  The pathophysiology of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy--a review of molecular and cellular insights.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Dipika V Patel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Safety of donor tissue preparation and use of descemetoschisis and torn tissue in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Ludwig M Heindl; Franziska Bucher; Albert Caramoy; Deniz Hos; Mario Matthaei; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Influence of donor characteristics on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Silja Hüther; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; T San Ong; Bob Ververs; Jacqueline van der Wees
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Konstantinos Droutsas; Korine van Dijk; Kyros Moutsouris; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; T San Ong; Bob Ververs; Jacqueline van der Wees
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: learning curve of a single surgeon.

Authors:  Konstantinos Droutsas; Eleftherios Giallouros; Gerrit R J Melles; Klio Chatzistefanou; Walter Sekundo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant.

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  23 in total

1.  Endothelial keratoplasty: is Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty the Holy Grail of lamellar surgery? No.

Authors:  M Tsatsos; V S Liarakos; C MacGregor; I Athanasiadis; E T Detorakis; M M Moschos; P Hossain; D F Anderson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  [10 years of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy : What have we learned?]

Authors:  M Matthaei; S Schrittenlocher; D Hos; S Siebelmann; F Bucher; F Schaub; R Hoerster; R Siggel; S Roters; L M Heindl; B Bachmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Pre-Descemets endothelial keratoplasty: the PDEK clamp for successful PDEK.

Authors:  H S Dua; D G Said
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Impact of corneal donor lens status on two-year course and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Friederike Schaub; Layla Pohl; Philip Enders; Werner Adler; Björn O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Risk and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection on Corneal Transplantation: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Harry Levine; Paula A Sepulveda-Beltran; Diego S Altamirano; Alfonso L Sabater; Sander R Dubovy; Harry W Flynn; Guillermo Amescua
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 7.  [Complications of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty].

Authors:  K Spaniol; M Borrelli; C Holtmann; S Schrader; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  T Röck; M Bramkamp; K U Bartz-Schmidt; D Röck; E Yörük
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Cornea Procurement and Processing up to 72 Hours: No Risk for Cornea Transplant Quality.

Authors:  Nicola Hofmann; Ilka Wittmershaus; Anna-Katharina Salz; Martin Börgel
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 10.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure.

Authors:  Alastair J Stuart; Vito Romano; Gianni Virgili; Alex J Shortt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.