Literature DB >> 24675376

Influence of donor characteristics on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Sonja Heinzelmann1, Silja Hüther, Daniel Böhringer, Philipp Eberwein, Thomas Reinhard, Philip Maier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Penetrating keratoplasty is being replaced by posterior lamellar techniques like Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the surgical treatment of patients with endothelial insufficiency. Although DMEK leads to the best visual results, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is still the standard procedure for many surgeons because it is technically more standardized. Here, we investigated how donor characteristics may influence DMEK surgery.
METHODS: After in vitro preparation of DMEK grafts (n = 28), we measured the width of the graft roll, which we correlated to various donor characteristics. In 31 DMEK cases, we measured the intraoperative time from implantation to attachment of the graft, which we correlated to the respective donor characteristics and endothelial cell loss. We used Pearson's method and a multifactorial linear model for the statistical assessments.
RESULTS: We found a statistically significant correlation between donor age (P < 0.001) and endothelial cell density (P < 0.05), and the width of the DMEK rolls. That is, older donors and grafts with higher endothelial cell densities formed broader graft rolls. Donor age also showed a trend to directly influence the unfolding time that took longer using younger grafts. Furthermore, the relative endothelial cell loss increased with longer unfolding times.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that donor age and endothelial cell density influence the properties of DMEK grafts, and thereby the duration of the surgical procedure. Increased unfolding times result in higher endothelial cell loss. Therefore, it seems reasonable to accept preferably older donors with high endothelial cell densities for DMEK, which may be particularly true for inexperienced surgeons or complex clinical situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24675376     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  32 in total

1.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; D Böhringer; P Eberwein; T Reinhard; P Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Risk factors for eye bank preparation failure of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue.

Authors:  Lucas M M Vianna; Christopher G Stoeger; Joshua D Galloway; Mark Terry; Leslie Cope; Rubens Belfort; Albert S Jun
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thabo Lapp; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  [Influence of the donor age on graft survival : Is the demographic change also important for corneal tissue donation?]

Authors:  N Hofmann; M Derks; M Börgel; K Engelmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 5.  [10 years of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy : What have we learned?]

Authors:  M Matthaei; S Schrittenlocher; D Hos; S Siebelmann; F Bucher; F Schaub; R Hoerster; R Siggel; S Roters; L M Heindl; B Bachmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Anna-Karina B Maier; Enken Gundlach; Jan Schroeter; Matthias K J Klamann; Johannes Gonnermann; Aline I Riechardt; Eckart Bertelmann; Antonia M Joussen; Necip Torun
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Pre-Descemets endothelial keratoplasty: the PDEK clamp for successful PDEK.

Authors:  H S Dua; D G Said
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Negative impact of dextran in organ culture media for pre-stripped tissue preservation on DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) outcome.

Authors:  Alaadin Abdin; Loay Daas; Max Pattmöller; Shady Suffo; Achim Langenbucher; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using corneas from elderly donors.

Authors:  Satoru Nakatani; Akira Murakami
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.