Literature DB >> 26216795

Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

T Röck1, M Bramkamp2, K U Bartz-Schmidt3, D Röck3, E Yörük3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate Descemet graft (DG) detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in relation to DG position.
METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive pseudophakic eyes that underwent DMEK (175 eyes for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy) from September 2009 through February 2014 at the Tübingen Eye Hospital DG position were studied retrospectively by surgical video at the end of an operation. A group of 45 eyes showed a decentration of the DG with a stromal gap of ≥1.5 mm over at least 3 clock hours between the descematorhexis edge and the DG. DG detachment was documented at a mean follow-up of 13.9 ± 3.7 months after surgery. DG detachment was defined as a detachment of 20 % or more of the DG surface area. Various donor characteristics and patient characteristics were analyzed.
RESULTS: The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the group of eyes with central well-positioned DG differed significantly from those of eyes with decentered DG. The preoperative BCVA in the central well-positioned DG group was 0.63 ± 0.40 logMAR, and in the decentered DG group 0.91 ± 0.51 logMAR (P < 0.001). The postoperative BCVA in the group of eyes with central well-positioned DG was 0.12 ± 0.11 logMAR, and in the group with decentered DG 0.23 ± 0.29 logMAR (P < 0.001). Endothelial cell density and patient characteristics such as age, gender, and intraocular pressure did not differ significantly between the two groups. The group of eyes with central well-positioned DG showed DG detachment in 12 %; the group with decentered DG findings had DG detachment in 87 % (P < 0.001) at the 12 month follow up.
CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate the importance of central well-positioned DG and the relation of disease severity. Central well-positioned DG may reduce the incidence of DG detachment. Overlapping of the donor DG and the host Descemet membrane seems to be responsible for DG detachment. One possible way to enhance graft adhesion could be a larger descematorhexis, which avoids an overlapping. The second possible way could be not waiting too long for surgery to reduce disease severity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centrally positioned Descemet graft; Descemet graft detachment; Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK); Posterior lamellar keratoplasty; Recovery of corneal transparency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26216795     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3103-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

1.  Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Martin Dirisamer; Korine van Dijk; Isabel Dapena; Lisanne Ham; Oganesyan Oganes; Laurence E Frank; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-14

2.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK.

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Standardization of the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty technique: Outcomes of the first 450 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M Satué; M Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora; M Naveiras; J Cabrerizo; I Dapena; G R J Melles
Journal:  Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol       Date:  2015-03-25

4.  Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Paula J Ousley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The endothelium of clear corneal transplants.

Authors:  W M Bourne; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-10

6.  Novel maneuver facilitating Descemet membrane unfolding in the anterior chamber.

Authors:  Efdal Yoeruek; Tarek Bayyoud; Johanna Hofmann; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Frederico P Guerra; Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Arthur W Giebel; Francis W Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Gerrit R J Melles; T San Ong; Bob Ververs; Jacqueline van der Wees
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Novel surgical instruments facilitating Descemet membrane dissection.

Authors:  Efdal Yoeruek; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Bartz Schmidt
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant.

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  9 in total

1.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sonja Heinzelmann; Daniel Böhringer; Philipp Eberwein; Thabo Lapp; Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Keegan B Mechels; Michael D Greenwood; Ramu G Sudhagoni; John P Berdahl
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-05

4.  Quantifying Graft Detachment after Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Friso G Heslinga; Mark Alberti; Josien P W Pluim; Javier Cabrerizo; Mitko Veta
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Identification of the preoperative and perioperative factors that predict postoperative endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dimitri Chaussard; Florian Bloch; Arpiné Ardzivian Elnar; Yinka Zevering; Jean-Charles Vermion; Rémi Moskwa; Jean-Marc Perone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evolution of corneal transplantation techniques and their indications in a French corneal transplant unit in 2000-2020.

Authors:  Vianney Malleron; Florian Bloch; Yinka Zevering; Jean-Charles Vermion; Axelle Semler-Collery; Christophe Goetz; Jean-Marc Perone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Corneal pachymetry by AS-OCT after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Friso G Heslinga; Ruben T Lucassen; Myrthe A van den Berg; Luuk van der Hoek; Josien P W Pluim; Javier Cabrerizo; Mark Alberti; Mitko Veta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Evolution of Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Tobias Röck; Johanna Landenberger; Matthias Bramkamp; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Daniel Röck
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 1.530

9.  Trends in corneal transplantation at the University Eye Hospital in Tübingen, Germany over the last 12 years: 2004 - 2015.

Authors:  Tobias Röck; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Daniel Röck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.