Literature DB >> 21777980

Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases.

Isabel Dapena1, Lisanne Ham, Konstantinos Droutsas, Korine van Dijk, Kyros Moutsouris, Gerrit R J Melles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the learning curve in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in the management of corneal endothelial disorders.
DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, clinical study at a tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: We included 135 eyes of 118 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.
METHODS: In a first group of 135 consecutive eyes, a DMEK was performed. To determine the extent of a possible learning curve in DMEK surgery, the whole group was divided into 3 subgroups of 45 patients, to compare clinical outcomes at 1, 3, and 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and intra- and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Among the 3 groups clinical outcomes were similar, with 73% of cases achieving a BCVA of ≥20/25 (≥0.8) and an average ECD of 1747 ± 527 cells/mm², at 6 months. Graft detachment was the main complication and correlated with intraoperative vitreous pressure (P<0.01). The detachment rate declined with experience: In the first 45 cases, a complete or partial graft detachment occurred in 20%, in the second group in 13.3%, and in the third group in 4.4%. Other complications were relatively uncommon: Failure to unfold or position the graft during surgery (0.7%), intraocular hemorrhage (0.7%), primary graft failure (2.2%), air-bubble induced angle closure glaucoma (3%), remnant host Descemet's at the interface (5.9%), and cystoid macular edema (0.7%). Surgeries (partially) performed by an inexperienced surgeon showed a similar clinical outcome and complication rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve in DMEK did not correlate with clinical outcome (BCVA and ECD), but rather to the presence of a functional graft. However, the number of functional grafts (decline in graft detachment rate) increased with surgical experience. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosures may be found after the references.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21777980     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  34 in total

1.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; D Böhringer; P Eberwein; T Reinhard; P Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Standardized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): technique and latest results].

Authors:  P P Ciechanowski; K Droutsas; L Baydoun; M Dirisamer; S Oellerich; G R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leru Zhu; Yi Zha; Jianqiu Cai; Yanling Zhang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Endothelial keratoplasty: is Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty the way forward? Yes.

Authors:  V S Liarakos; M Tsatsos; M Satue; G R J Melles
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: surgical outcomes and endothelial cell count modelling from a UK centre.

Authors:  Mark A P Fajgenbaum; Nick Kopsachilis; Emma J Hollick
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of cystoid macular edema post Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Koji Kitazawa; Kanae Kayukawa; Koichi Wakimasu; Tsutomu Inatomi; Osamu Hieda; Kazuhiko Mori; Chie Sotozono; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Anna-Karina B Maier; Enken Gundlach; Jan Schroeter; Matthias K J Klamann; Johannes Gonnermann; Aline I Riechardt; Eckart Bertelmann; Antonia M Joussen; Necip Torun
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Incidental central tear in Descemet membrane endothelial complex during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vikas Mittal; Ruchi Mittal; Rajat Jain; Virender S Sangwan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-27

9.  Endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a retained angle-supported intraocular lens.

Authors:  Konstantinos Droutsas; Apostolos Lazaridis; George Kymionis; Klio Chatzistefanou; Dimitris Papaconstantinou; Walter Sekundo; Chryssanthi Koutsandrea
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  [Management of corneal endothelial decompensation with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty in a patient with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant].

Authors:  T Röck; K-U Bartz-Schmidt; D Röck; E Yoeruek
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.