Literature DB >> 33996450

The area method for measuring acetabular cup anteversion: An accurate and autonomous solution.

Michael P Murphy1, Cameron J Killen1, Steven J Ralles1, Nicholas M Brown1, Albert J Song2, Karen Wu1.   

Abstract

Several radiological methods of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty have been described, all time-consuming and with varying reproducibility. This study aimed to compare the recently proposed Area method to true cup anteversion as determined by an accelerometer. This study further applied this method programmatically to autonomously determine radiographic cup orientation using two computer programs, then compared these results to hand and accelerometer measurements. 160 anteroposterior pelvis radiographs were taken of a standard Sawbones® pelvis fitted with a total hip arthroplasty system. The acetabular cup was re-oriented between each radiograph, with anteversion ranging from 0° to 90°. An accelerometer was mounted to the cup to measure true cup anteversion. Radiographic anteversion was independently measured via three methods: by hand, linear image processing, and machine learning. Measurements were compared to triaxial accelerometer recordings. Coefficient of determination (R2) was found to be 0.997, 0.991, and 0.989 for hand measurements, the machine learning, and linear image processing, respectively. The machine learning program and hand measurements overestimated anteversion by 0.70° and 0.02° respectively. The program using linear techniques underestimated anteversion by 5.02°. Average runtime was 0.03 and 0.59 s for the machine learning and linear image processing program, respectively. The machine learning program averaged within 1° of cup orientation given a true cup anteversion less than 51°, and within 2° given an anteversion less than 85°. The Area method showed great accuracy and reliability with hand measurements compared to true anteversion. The results of this study support the use of machine learning for accurate, timely, autonomous assessment of cup orientation.
© 2021 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anteversion; Computer assisted surgery; Orientation; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33996450      PMCID: PMC8099551          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  24 in total

1.  Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs.

Authors:  R Pradhan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-05

2.  Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph?

Authors:  Benjamin McArthur; Michael Cross; Christina Geatrakas; David Mayman; Bernard Ghelman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Chen-Kun Liaw; Sheng-Mou Hou; Rong-Sen Yang; Tai-Yin Wu; Chiou-Shann Fuh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Zhinian Wan; William T Long; Michael Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.

Authors:  D J Langton; T J Joyce; S S Jameson; J Lord; M Van Orsouw; J P Holland; A V F Nargol; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

6.  The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G E R Thomas; H Pandit; D J Beard; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  A precise method for determining acetabular component anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael P Murphy; Cameron J Killen; Steven J Ralles; Nicholas M Brown; William J Hopkinson; Karen Wu
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Acetabular component positioning using the transverse acetabular ligament: can you find it and does it help?

Authors:  Noah J Epstein; Steven T Woolson; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component.

Authors:  R Biedermann; A Tonin; M Krismer; F Rachbauer; G Eibl; B Stöckl
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

10.  The validity and reproducibility of cross table radiographs compared with CT scans for the measurement of anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Pankaj; A Mittal; A Chawla
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.