Literature DB >> 25623675

Efficacy and complications of the adjustable sling system ArgusT for male incontinence: results of a prospective 2-center study.

Ricarda M Bauer1, Michael Rutkowski2, Alexander Kretschmer3, Jozefina Casuscelli3, Christian G Stief3, Wilhelm Huebner2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and the safety of the ArgusT in male patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence.
METHODS: A prospective 2-center evaluation was conducted on consecutive patients treated for persistent stress incontinence. Forty-two patients were implanted with the ArgusT male sling system with no associated surgery. Measurements included daily pad usage, 24-hour pad weight test, International Quality of Life questionnaire, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire short form, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. Postoperative complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The definitions used were cured, 0-5 g in 24-hour pad weight test; improved, reduction of urine loss in 24-hour pad weight test >50%; and failed, all others.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 28.8 months (20-38 months), 26 patients were dry (61.9%) with a pad test of 0-5 g/24 hours. Eleven patients (26.2%) improved. Five patients are considered failures. Overall daily pad use, urine loss in the 24-hour pad test, and quality of life scores improved significantly after sling implantation. Median adjustment rate was 1.7. There were no perioperative complications. Postoperative complications were mainly grade I and II complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
CONCLUSION: The ArgusT sling system offers an effective and safe treatment option for male patients with moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence in a follow-up >2 years, even after radiotherapy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25623675     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  Review of surgical implant procedures for male incontinence after radical prostatectomy according to IDEAL framework.

Authors:  Dimitri Barski; Holger Gerullis; Thomas Otto
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-06

Review 2.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation.

Authors:  Sandra Mühlstädt; Alexander Friedl; Nasreldin Mohammed; André Schumann; Karl Weigand; Felix Kawan; Christian Göllert; Christin Kahlert; Gerit Theil; Kersten Fischer; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Urinary incontinence in men].

Authors:  R M Bauer; M Oelke; W Hübner; M Grabbert; R Kirschner-Hermanns; R Anding
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study.

Authors:  Tanja Hüsch; Alexander Kretschmer; Alice Obaje; Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns; Ralf Anding; Tobias Pottek; Achim Rose; Roberto Olianas; Alexander Friedl; Roland Homberg; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Rudi Abdunnur; Fabian Queissert; Carsten M Naumann; Josef Schweiger; Carola Wotzka; Joanne Nyarangi-Dix; Torben Hofmann; Kurt Ulm; Wilhelm Hübner; Ricarda M Bauer; Axel Haferkamp
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

6.  Comparison of adjustable male slings and artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of male urinary incontinence: a retrospective analysis of patient selection and postoperative continence status.

Authors:  M Grabbert; T Hüsch; A Kretschmer; R Kirschner-Hermanns; R Anding; A Rose; A Friedl; A Obaje; A Heidenreich; B Brehmer; C M Naumann; F Queissert; H Loertzer; J Pfitzenmaier; J Nyarangi-Dix; M Kurosch; R Olianas; R Homberg; R Abdunnur; J Schweiger; T Hofmann; C Wotzka; T Pottek; W Huebner; A Haferkamp; R M Bauer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?

Authors:  Craig V Comiter; Amy D Dobberfuhl
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-01-11

8.  Sling Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence Including Post Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Challenge to the Urologist.

Authors:  Kwang Jin Ko; Sung Jin Kim; Sung Tae Cho
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 9.  Adjustable sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laercio Antonio da Silva; Rogério Simonetti; Edina Mariko Koga da Silva
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-09-23

10.  Targeting Moderate and Severe Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With Adjustable Male Slings and the Perineal Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Focus on Perioperative Complications and Device Explantations.

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Tanja Hüsch; Frauke Thomsen; Dominik Kronlachner; Alice Obaje; Ralf Anding; Tobias Pottek; Achim Rose; Roberto Olianas; Alexander Friedl; Wilhelm Hübner; Roland Homberg; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Fabian Queissert; Carsten M Naumann; Carola Wotzka; Torben Hofmann; Roland Seiler; Axel Haferkamp; Ricarda M Bauer
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.