Literature DB >> 25622696

Pharmacophore modeling using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) with multiple probe molecules.

Wenbo Yu1, Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju, E Prabhu Raman, Lei Fang, Alexander D MacKerell.   

Abstract

Receptor-based pharmacophore modeling is an efficient computer-aided drug design technique that uses the structure of the target protein to identify novel leads. However, most methods consider protein flexibility and desolvation effects in a very approximate way, which may limit their use in practice. The Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) assisted pharmacophore modeling protocol (SILCS-Pharm) was introduced recently to address these issues, as SILCS naturally takes both protein flexibility and desolvation effects into account by using full molecular dynamics simulations to determine 3D maps of the functional group-affinity patterns on a target receptor. In the present work, the SILCS-Pharm protocol is extended to use a wider range of probe molecules including benzene, propane, methanol, formamide, acetaldehyde, methylammonium, acetate and water. This approach removes the previous ambiguity brought by using water as both the hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor probe molecule. The new SILCS-Pharm protocol is shown to yield improved screening results, as compared to the previous approach based on three target proteins. Further validation of the new protocol using five additional protein targets showed improved screening compared to those using common docking methods, further indicating improvements brought by the explicit inclusion of additional feature types associated with the wider collection of probe molecules in the SILCS simulations. The advantage of using complementary features and volume constraints, based on exclusion maps of the protein defined from the SILCS simulations, is presented. In addition, reranking using SILCS-based ligand grid free energies is shown to enhance the diversity of identified ligands for the majority of targets. These results suggest that the SILCS-Pharm protocol will be of utility in rational drug design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25622696      PMCID: PMC4339487          DOI: 10.1021/ci500691p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  50 in total

1.  Preparation, characterization, and the crystal structure of the inhibitor ZK-807834 (CI-1031) complexed with factor Xa.

Authors:  M Adler; D D Davey; G B Phillips; S H Kim; J Jancarik; G Rumennik; D R Light; M Whitlow
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Ionization states of the catalytic residues in HIV-1 protease.

Authors:  R Smith; I M Brereton; R Y Chai; S B Kent
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1996-11

Review 3.  Three-dimensional pharmacophore methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Andrew R Leach; Valerie J Gillet; Richard A Lewis; Robin Taylor
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) assisted pharmacophore modeling.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; E Prabhu Raman; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Reproducing crystal binding modes of ligand functional groups using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Wenbo Yu; Olgun Guvench; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Automated generation of MCSS-derived pharmacophoric DOCK site points for searching multiconformation databases.

Authors:  Diane Joseph-McCarthy; Juan C Alvarez
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-05-01

7.  Computational fragment-based binding site identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  A highly potent non-nucleoside adenosine deaminase inhibitor: efficient drug discovery by intentional lead hybridization.

Authors:  Tadashi Terasaka; Takayoshi Kinoshita; Masako Kuno; Isao Nakanishi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  26 in total

1.  Iminoguanidines as Allosteric Inhibitors of the Iron-Regulated Heme Oxygenase (HemO) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Heinzl; Weiliang Huang; Wenbo Yu; Bennett J Giardina; Yue Zhou; Alexander D MacKerell; Angela Wilks; Fengtian Xue
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Ranking Reversible Covalent Drugs: From Free Energy Perturbation to Fragment Docking.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Wenjuan Jiang; Payal Chatterjee; Yun Luo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Structure-based design of N-substituted 1-hydroxy-4-sulfamoyl-2-naphthoates as selective inhibitors of the Mcl-1 oncoprotein.

Authors:  Maryanna E Lanning; Wenbo Yu; Jeremy L Yap; Jay Chauhan; Lijia Chen; Ellis Whiting; Lakshmi S Pidugu; Tyler Atkinson; Hala Bailey; Willy Li; Braden M Roth; Lauren Hynicka; Kirsty Chesko; Eric A Toth; Paul Shapiro; Alexander D MacKerell; Paul T Wilder; Steven Fletcher
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 4.  Computational functional group mapping for drug discovery.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 5.  Driving Structure-Based Drug Discovery through Cosolvent Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

7.  Optimization and Evaluation of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) as a Tool for Target-Based Ligand Optimization.

Authors:  Vincent D Ustach; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Sunhwan Jo; Wenbo Yu; Wenjuan Jiang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Novel protein-inhibitor interactions in site 3 of Ca(2+)-bound S100B as discovered by X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  Michael C Cavalier; Zephan Melville; Ehson Aligholizadeh; E Prabhu Raman; Wenbo Yu; Lei Fang; Milad Alasady; Adam D Pierce; Paul T Wilder; Alexander D MacKerell; David J Weber
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 7.652

9.  Identification and characterization of fragment binding sites for allosteric ligand design using the site identification by ligand competitive saturation hotspots approach (SILCS-Hotspots).

Authors:  Alexander D MacKerell; Sunhwan Jo; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Christoffer Lind; Wenbo Yu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.770

10.  Comparing pharmacophore models derived from crystallography and NMR ensembles.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.