Literature DB >> 31034213

Optimization and Evaluation of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) as a Tool for Target-Based Ligand Optimization.

Vincent D Ustach1, Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju2, Sunhwan Jo2, Wenbo Yu1, Wenjuan Jiang1, Alexander D MacKerell1,2.   

Abstract

Chemical fragment cosolvent sampling techniques have become a versatile tool in ligand-protein binding prediction. Site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) is one such method that maps the distribution of chemical fragments on a protein as free energy fields called FragMaps. Ligands are then simulated via Monte Carlo techniques in the field of the FragMaps (SILCS-MC) to predict their binding conformations and relative affinities for the target protein. Application of SILCS-MC using a number of different scoring schemes and MC sampling protocols against multiple protein targets was undertaken to evaluate and optimize the predictive capability of the method. Seven protein targets and 551 ligands with broad chemical variability were used to evaluate and optimize the model to maximize Pearson's correlation coefficient, Pearlman's predictive index, correct relative binding affinity, and root-mean-square error versus the absolute experimental binding affinities. Across the protein-ligand sets, the relative affinities of the ligands were predicted correctly an average of 69% of the time for the highest overall SILCS protocol. Training the FragMap weighting factors using a Bayesian machine learning (ML) algorithm led to an increase to an average 75% relative correct affinity predictions. Furthermore, once the optimal protocol is identified for a specific protein-ligand system average predictabilities of 76% are achieved. The ML algorithm is successful with small training sets of data (30 or more compounds) due to the use of physically correct FragMap weights as priors. Notably, the 76% correct relative prediction rate is similar to or better than free energy perturbation methods that are significantly computationally more expensive than SILCS. The results further support the utility of SILCS as a powerful and computationally accessible tool to support lead optimization and development in drug discovery.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31034213      PMCID: PMC6597307          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  58 in total

1.  MCDOCK: a Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem.

Authors:  M Liu; S Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Helen M Berman; Tammy Battistuz; T N Bhat; Wolfgang F Bluhm; Philip E Bourne; Kyle Burkhardt; Zukang Feng; Gary L Gilliland; Lisa Iype; Shri Jain; Phoebe Fagan; Jessica Marvin; David Padilla; Veerasamy Ravichandran; Bohdan Schneider; Narmada Thanki; Helge Weissig; John D Westbrook; Christine Zardecki
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2002-05-29

Review 4.  Progress in predicting human ADME parameters in silico.

Authors:  S Ekins; C L Waller; P W Swaan; G Cruciani; S A Wrighton; J H Wikel
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.950

5.  QSAR and ADME.

Authors:  Corwin Hansch; Albert Leo; Suresh Babu Mekapati; Alka Kurup
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations of water in protein environments.

Authors:  Hyung-June Woo; Aaron R Dinner; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation of ligand-protein binding.

Authors:  Matthew Clark; Frank Guarnieri; Igor Shkurko; Jeff Wiseman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Ian W Davis; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  New predictive models for blood-brain barrier permeability of drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Dmitriy Chekmarev; William J Welsh; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  17 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of fragment binding sites for allosteric ligand design using the site identification by ligand competitive saturation hotspots approach (SILCS-Hotspots).

Authors:  Alexander D MacKerell; Sunhwan Jo; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Christoffer Lind; Wenbo Yu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.770

2.  Application of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation in Computer-Aided Drug Design.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Wenbo Yu; Sunhwan Jo; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  New J Chem       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.591

3.  Efficient Hit-to-Lead Searching of Kinase Inhibitor Chemical Space via Computational Fragment Merging.

Authors:  Grigorii V Andrianov; Wern Juin Gabriel Ong; Ilya Serebriiskii; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Assessing hERG1 Blockade from Bayesian Machine-Learning-Optimized Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation Simulations.

Authors:  Mahdi Mousaei; Meruyert Kudaibergenova; Alexander D MacKerell; Sergei Noskov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Impact of electronic polarizability on protein-functional group interactions.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Wenbo Yu; Vincent D Ustach; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Delin Sun; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Insights into Glucose-6-phosphate Allosteric Activation of β-Glucosidase A.

Authors:  Anderson A Gomes; Gustavo F da Silva; Sirish K Lakkaraju; Beatriz Gomes Guimarães; Alexander D MacKerell; Maria de Lourdes B Magalhães
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Functional Group Distributions, Partition Coefficients, and Resistance Factors in Lipid Bilayers Using Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation.

Authors:  Christoffer Lind; Poonam Pandey; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Simple Synthesis of a Heterocyclophane Exhibiting Anti-c-Met Activity by Acting as a Hatch Blocking Access to the Active Site*.

Authors:  Tatsuya Takimoto; Hideaki Sasaki; Hirohito Tsue; Hiroki Takahashi; Alexander D MacKerell; Ayumi Nakamura; Katsuya Nakano; Eori Okazaki; Tatsuki Betsuyaku; Ryosuke Tachibana; Kazuhito Hioki; Ozge Yoluk; Sunhwan Jo
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  Identification of multiple substrate binding sites in SLC4 transporters in the outward-facing conformation: insights into the transport mechanism.

Authors:  Hristina R Zhekova; Alexander Pushkin; Gülru Kayık; Liyo Kao; Rustam Azimov; Natalia Abuladze; Debra Kurtz; Mirna Damergi; Sergei Noskov; Ira Kurtz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Rapid and accurate estimation of protein-ligand relative binding affinities using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Vincent D Ustach; Sunhwan Jo; Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.