Literature DB >> 24610239

Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) assisted pharmacophore modeling.

Wenbo Yu1, Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju, E Prabhu Raman, Alexander D MacKerell.   

Abstract

Database screening using receptor-based pharmacophores is a computer-aided drug design technique that uses the structure of the target molecule (i.e. protein) to identify novel ligands that may bind to the target. Typically receptor-based pharmacophore modeling methods only consider a single or limited number of receptor conformations and map out the favorable binding patterns in vacuum or with a limited representation of the aqueous solvent environment, such that they may suffer from neglect of protein flexibility and desolvation effects. Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) is an approach that takes into account these, as well as other, properties to determine 3-dimensional maps of the functional group-binding patterns on a target receptor (i.e. FragMaps). In this study, a method to use the FragMaps to automatically generate receptor-based pharmacophore models is presented. It converts the FragMaps into SILCS pharmacophore features including aromatic, aliphatic, hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor chemical functionalities. The method generates multiple pharmacophore hypotheses that are then quantitatively ranked using SILCS grid free energies. The pharmacophore model generation protocol is validated using three different protein targets, including using the resulting models in virtual screening. Improved performance and efficiency of the SILCS derived pharmacophore models as compared to published docking studies, as well as a recently developed receptor-based pharmacophore modeling method is shown, indicating the potential utility of the approach in rational drug design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24610239      PMCID: PMC4048638          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9728-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  34 in total

Review 1.  Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery.

Authors:  Simon J Teague
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Accounting for water molecules in drug design.

Authors:  Sergio E Wong; Felice C Lightstone
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 3.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 4.  The role of water molecules in computational drug design.

Authors:  Stephanie B A de Beer; Nico P E Vermeulen; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Three-dimensional pharmacophore methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Andrew R Leach; Valerie J Gillet; Richard A Lewis; Robin Taylor
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Reproducing crystal binding modes of ligand functional groups using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Wenbo Yu; Olgun Guvench; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Automated generation of MCSS-derived pharmacophoric DOCK site points for searching multiconformation databases.

Authors:  Diane Joseph-McCarthy; Juan C Alvarez
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-05-01

8.  Computational fragment-based binding site identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design.

Authors:  Pietro Cozzini; Glen E Kellogg; Francesca Spyrakis; Donald J Abraham; Gabriele Costantino; Andrew Emerson; Francesca Fanelli; Holger Gohlke; Leslie A Kuhn; Garrett M Morris; Modesto Orozco; Thelma A Pertinhez; Menico Rizzi; Christoph A Sotriffer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  24 in total

1.  Structure-based design of N-substituted 1-hydroxy-4-sulfamoyl-2-naphthoates as selective inhibitors of the Mcl-1 oncoprotein.

Authors:  Maryanna E Lanning; Wenbo Yu; Jeremy L Yap; Jay Chauhan; Lijia Chen; Ellis Whiting; Lakshmi S Pidugu; Tyler Atkinson; Hala Bailey; Willy Li; Braden M Roth; Lauren Hynicka; Kirsty Chesko; Eric A Toth; Paul Shapiro; Alexander D MacKerell; Paul T Wilder; Steven Fletcher
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  Computational functional group mapping for drug discovery.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 3.  Driving Structure-Based Drug Discovery through Cosolvent Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Pharmacophore modeling using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) with multiple probe molecules.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; E Prabhu Raman; Lei Fang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  The FTMap family of web servers for determining and characterizing ligand-binding hot spots of proteins.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; Laurie E Grove; David R Hall; Tanggis Bohnuud; Scott E Mottarella; Lingqi Luo; Bing Xia; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

7.  Optimization and Evaluation of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) as a Tool for Target-Based Ligand Optimization.

Authors:  Vincent D Ustach; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Sunhwan Jo; Wenbo Yu; Wenjuan Jiang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Benchmark Sets for Binding Hot Spot Identification in Fragment-Based Ligand Discovery.

Authors:  Amanda E Wakefield; Christine Yueh; Dmitri Beglov; Marcelo S Castilho; Dima Kozakov; György M Keserű; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Comparing pharmacophore models derived from crystallography and NMR ensembles.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Identifying binding hot spots on protein surfaces by mixed-solvent molecular dynamics: HIV-1 protease as a test case.

Authors:  Peter M U Ung; Phani Ghanakota; Sarah E Graham; Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.