Literature DB >> 25616028

Accuracy and Reproducibility of High-definition Anorectal Manometry and Pressure Topography Analyses in Healthy Subjects.

Enrique Coss-Adame1, Satish S C Rao2, Jessica Valestin3, Amyra Ali-Azamar4, Jose M Remes-Troche4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: High-definition anorectal manometry (HDAM-3D) provides a topographic and 3-dimensional profile of anorectal pressure. We assessed anorectal sensorimotor function and the reproducibility of measurements made with HDAM-3D in healthy adults, and the accuracy of data analysis by its software.
METHODS: Anal sphincter pressures and rectal sensory thresholds were measured in 78 healthy subjects via placement of a 10-mm rigid probe, with 256 circumferentially arrayed pressure sensors, and a balloon in the rectum. The bearing down maneuver was assessed in a subset of 18 subjects. We compared data analyzed by an expert with findings from automated software analysis. Measurements made in a subset of 16 subjects, 2 weeks apart, were compared to determine reproducibility.
RESULTS: Resting, squeezing, and sustained squeezing pressures were significantly higher in men than in women (P < .05); other parameters were similar. Desire and urgency to defecate were similar between men and women, but the maximal tolerable volume was significantly lower in women (P < .05). Older women (>50 years) had significantly lower resting (P < .01) and sustained squeeze pressures (P < .04). Dyssynergic patterns of defecation were observed in 12 of 18 subjects (67%) who attempted to defecate without the 60-mL rectal balloon distention and in 6 of 18 subjects (33%) with the 60-mL rectal balloon distention. Test-retest values correlated (r = 0.81), as did analyses made by an expert vs software analyses of data (r = 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of HDAM-3D measurements in healthy adults, anal sphincter pressures are higher in men than in women, but sensory and other parameters are similar; older subjects have weaker sphincters. Many people were found to have dyssynergic patterns of defecation, which could be related to the probe or other technical issues, so this technique may not be suitable for assessing defecation patterns. Measurements made by HDAM-3D are reproducible, and data can be accurately analyzed by its software.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorectal Disorder; Balloon Expulsion; Neuromuscular; Rectal Motor Function

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616028      PMCID: PMC4442034          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  21 in total

Review 1.  Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience.

Authors:  Fernando Azpiroz; Paul Enck; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Assessment of functional gastrointestinal disease: the bowel disease questionnaire.

Authors:  N J Talley; S F Phillips; C M Wiltgen; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  Minimum standards of anorectal manometry.

Authors:  S S C Rao; F Azpiroz; N Diamant; P Enck; G Tougas; A Wald
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Investigation of the utility of colorectal function tests and Rome II criteria in dyssynergic defecation (Anismus).

Authors:  S S C Rao; R S Mudipalli; M Stessman; B Zimmerman
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  The external anal sphincter operates at short sarcomere length in humans.

Authors:  R K Mittal; G Sheean; B S Padda; R Lieber; M Raj Rajasekaran
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Topographic and manometric characterization of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex.

Authors:  G Cheeney; M Nguyen; J Valestin; S S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  What is necessary to diagnose constipation?

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Kalyani Meduri
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 8.  An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study.

Authors:  N J Talley; E A O'Keefe; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient.

Authors:  Jessica Noelting; Shiva K Ratuapli; Adil E Bharucha; Doris M Harvey; Karthik Ravi; Alan R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Methods of Evaluation of Anorectal Causes of Obstructed Defecation.

Authors:  Anne C Fabrizio; Yewande Alimi; Anjali S Kumar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

2.  Endoflip vs high-definition manometry in the assessment of fecal incontinence: A data-driven unsupervised comparison.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Catherine Sun; Guillaume Gourcerol; Anne M Leroi; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Three-Dimensional Anorectal Manometry Enhances Diagnostic Gain by Detecting Sphincter Defects and Puborectalis Pressure.

Authors:  Shreya Raja; Francis C Okeke; Ellen M Stein; Sameer Dhalla; Monica Nandwani; Kristle L Lynch; C Prakash Gyawali; John O Clarke
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  New Metrics in High-Resolution and High-Definition Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  Myeongsook Seo; Segyeong Joo; Kee Wook Jung; Eun Mi Song; Satish S C Rao; Seung-Jae Myung
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-11-05

Review 5.  High-resolution anorectal manometry: An expensive hobby or worth every penny?

Authors:  G Basilisco; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Chakraborty; K J Feuerhak; A R Zinsmeister; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte Andrianjafy; Laure Luciano; Camille Bazin; Karine Baumstarck; Michel Bouvier; Véronique Vitton
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A Predictive Model to Identify Patients With Fecal Incontinence Based on High-Definition Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Functional Anorectal Disorders.

Authors:  Satish Sc Rao; Adil E Bharucha; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Richelle Felt-Bersma; Charles Knowles; Allison Malcolm; Arnold Wald
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.