Literature DB >> 23877630

Appropriate use and clinical impact of transthoracic echocardiography.

Susan A Matulevicius1, Anand Rohatgi, Sandeep R Das, Angela L Price, Andres DeLuna, Sharon C Reimold.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) accounts for almost half of all cardiac imaging services and is a widely available and versatile tool. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) for echocardiography were developed to improve patient care and health outcomes. Prior studies have shown that most TTEs are appropriate by AUC. However, the associations among TTE, AUC, and their clinical impact have not been well explored.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the proportion of TTEs that affect clinical care in an academic medical center overall and in subgroups defined as appropriate and inappropriate by AUC. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective review of medical records from 535 consecutive TTEs at an academic medical center was performed. The TTEs were classified according to 2011 AUC by 2 cardiologists blinded to clinical impact and were assessed for clinical impact by 2 cardiologists blinded to AUC. Clinical impact was assigned to 1 of the following 3 categories: (1) active change in care, (2) continuation of current care, or (3) no change in care. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred thirty-five patients undergoing TTE. EXPOSURE: Transthoracic echocardiography. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prevalence of appropriate, inappropriate, and uncertain TTEs and prevalence of clinical impact subcategories.
RESULTS: Overall, 31.8% of TTEs resulted in an active change in care; 46.9%, continuation of current care; and 21.3%, no change in care. By 2011 AUC, 91.8% of TTEs were appropriate; 4.3%, inappropriate; and 3.9%, uncertain. We detected no statistically significant difference between appropriate and inappropriate TTEs in the proportion of TTEs that led to active change in care (32.2% vs 21.7%; P= .29). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although 9 in 10 TTEs were appropriate by 2011 AUC, fewer than 1 in 3 TTEs resulted in an active change in care, nearly half resulted in continuation of current care, and slightly more than 1 in 5 resulted in no change in care. The low rate of active change in care (31.8%) among TTEs mostly classified as appropriate (91.8%) highlights the need for a better method to optimize TTE utilization to use limited health care resources efficiently while providing high-quality care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877630     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  30 in total

1.  Variation in the Echocardiographic Surveillance of Primary Mitral Regurgitation.

Authors:  Varsha K Tanguturi; Michael K Hidrue; Michael H Picard; Steven J Atlas; Jeffrey B Weilburg; Timothy G Ferris; Katrina Armstrong; Jason H Wasfy
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of cardiothoracic ratio on admission chest radiography to detect left or right ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Harmeet S Chana; Claire A Martin; Holly E Cakebread; Felicia D Adjei; Parag R Gajendragadkar
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Hospital-level variation in use of cardiovascular testing for adults with incident heart failure: findings from the cardiovascular research network heart failure study.

Authors:  Steven A Farmer; Justin Lenzo; David J Magid; Jerry H Gurwitz; David H Smith; Grace Hsu; Sue Hee Sung; Alan S Go
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-18

4.  A systematic review of Appropriate Use Criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: are they relevant outside the United States?

Authors:  Robert N Kerley; Siun O'Flynn
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Impact of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Clinical Care.

Authors:  Sloane McGraw; Simone Romano; Jennifer Jue; Michael A Bauml; Jaehoon Chung; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-III database.

Authors:  Mengling Feng; Jakob I McSparron; Dang Trung Kien; David J Stone; David H Roberts; Richard M Schwartzstein; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography: Evolving Applications in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.

Authors:  Amita Singh; R Parker Ward
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Addition of price transparency to an education and feedback intervention reduces utilization of inpatient echocardiography by resident physicians.

Authors:  Patrick M Kozak; Silas P Trumbo; Bradley W Christensen; David L Leverenz; Matthew S Shotwell; Adam J Kingeter
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.

Authors:  Thomas P Koshy; Anand Rohatgi; Sandeep R Das; Angela L Price; Andres deLuna; Nicholas Reimold; Kyle Willett; Sharon C Reimold; Susan A Matulevicius
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Defining Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ron Blankstein; Jill E Jacobs; Jonathon A Leipsic; Raymond Y Kwong; Viviany R Taqueti; Rob S B Beanlands; Jennifer H Mieres; Scott D Flamm; Thomas C Gerber; John Spertus; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.