Literature DB >> 23405393

Repeat testing among Medicare beneficiaries.

H Gilbert Welch1, Kevin J Hayes, Carol Frost.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the tendency to repeat examinations is a major determinant of the capacity to serve new patients and of the ability to contain health care costs, little research has described the patterns observed in actual practice.
METHODS: We investigated patterns of repeat testing in a longitudinal study of a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, restricted to 743,478 fee-for-service patients who were alive for a 3-year period after their index test between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2006. Using the 50 largest metropolitan statistical areas as the unit of analysis, we examined the relationship between the proportion of the population tested and the proportion of tests repeated among those tested.
RESULTS: Among beneficiaries undergoing echocardiography, 55% had a second test within 3 years. Repeat testing following other examinations was also common: 44% of imaging stress tests were repeated within 3 years, as were 49% of pulmonary function tests, 46% of chest computed tomography, 41% of cystoscopies, and 35% of upper endoscopies. The proportion of the population tested and the proportion of tests repeated varied across metropolitan statistical areas. The proportion who underwent echocardiography was highest in Miami, Florida (48%, among whom 66% of examinations were repeated in 3 years), and was lowest in Portland, Oregon (18%, among whom 47% of examinations were repeated in 3 years). Across 50 metropolitan statistical areas, the proportion of the population tested was consistently positively correlated with the proportion of tests repeated for echocardiography (Spearman r = 0.87, P < .001), imaging stress test (r = 0.65, P < .001), pulmonary function test (r = 0.62, P < .001), chest computed tomography (r = 0.66, P < .001), cystoscopy (r = 0.21, P = .13), and upper endoscopy (r = 0.59, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Repeat testing is common among Medicare beneficiaries. Patients residing in metropolitan statistical areas with high rates of population testing are more likely to be tested and are more likely to have their test repeated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23405393     DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  12 in total

1.  Effects of an Electronic Medical Record Intervention on Appropriateness of Transthoracic Echocardiograms: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Weihan Chen; David T Saxon; Michael P Henry; John R Herald; Rob Holleman; Debbie Zawol; Stacy Sivils; Mohamad A Kenaan; Theodore J Kolias; Hitinder S Gurm; Nicole M Bhave
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Examining the association between utilization management and downstream cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Abiy Agiro; Gosia Sylwestrzak; Christiane Shah; Thomas Power; Andrea DeVries
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in Place of Repeat Echocardiography: Reliability and Cost Implications.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Nidhi Mehta; Jeremy A Mazurek; Victor A Ferrari; Andrew J Epstein; Peter W Groeneveld; James N Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.

Authors:  Thomas P Koshy; Anand Rohatgi; Sandeep R Das; Angela L Price; Andres deLuna; Nicholas Reimold; Kyle Willett; Sharon C Reimold; Susan A Matulevicius
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Variation in use of echocardiography among veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration vs Medicare.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Fenton H McCarthy; Sheeva Rajaei; Andrew J Epstein; Paul A Heidenreich; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Appropriateness of imaging for lung cancer staging in a national cohort.

Authors:  Leah M Backhus; Farhood Farjah; Thomas K Varghese; Aaron M Cheng; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Douglas E Wood; Larry Kessler; Steven B Zeliadt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.

Authors:  Shannon Brownlee; Kalipso Chalkidou; Jenny Doust; Adam G Elshaug; Paul Glasziou; Iona Heath; Somil Nagpal; Vikas Saini; Divya Srivastava; Kelsey Chalmers; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cardiac Stress Test Trends Among US Patients Younger Than 65 Years, 2005-2012.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Fenton H McCarthy; Elias Dayoub; Steven M Bradley; Frederick A Masoudi; P Michael Ho; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

9.  The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing.

Authors:  Todd C Kerwin; Harmony Leighton; Kunal Buch; Azriel Avezbadalov; Hormoz Kianfar
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  To what extent do hospitalised patients receive appropriate CT and MRI scans? Results of a cross-sectional study in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Aida Bianco; Rossella Zucco; Francesca Lotito; Maria Pavia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.