Literature DB >> 25613588

Classifying adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) based on functional and structural imaging.

Reto Iannaccone1,2, Tobias U Hauser1,3,4, Juliane Ball1, Daniel Brandeis1,3,5,6, Susanne Walitza1,3,5, Silvia Brem7,8.   

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common disabling psychiatric disorder associated with consistent deficits in error processing, inhibition and regionally decreased grey matter volumes. The diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, interviews and questionnaires, which are to some degree subjective and would benefit from verification through biomarkers. Here, pattern recognition of multiple discriminative functional and structural brain patterns was applied to classify adolescents with ADHD and controls. Functional activation features in a Flanker/NoGo task probing error processing and inhibition along with structural magnetic resonance imaging data served to predict group membership using support vector machines (SVMs). The SVM pattern recognition algorithm correctly classified 77.78% of the subjects with a sensitivity and specificity of 77.78% based on error processing. Predictive regions for controls were mainly detected in core areas for error processing and attention such as the medial and dorsolateral frontal areas reflecting deficient processing in ADHD (Hart et al., in Hum Brain Mapp 35:3083-3094, 2014), and overlapped with decreased activations in patients in conventional group comparisons. Regions more predictive for ADHD patients were identified in the posterior cingulate, temporal and occipital cortex. Interestingly despite pronounced univariate group differences in inhibition-related activation and grey matter volumes the corresponding classifiers failed or only yielded a poor discrimination. The present study corroborates the potential of task-related brain activation for classification shown in previous studies. It remains to be clarified whether error processing, which performed best here, also contributes to the discrimination of useful dimensions and subtypes, different psychiatric disorders, and prediction of treatment success across studies and sites.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADHD; Adolescence; Attention; Classification; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613588     DOI: 10.1007/s00787-015-0678-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  62 in total

1.  A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring.

Authors:  H Garavan; T J Ross; J Kaufman; E A Stein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Voxel-based morphometry versus region of interest: a comparison of two methods for analyzing gray matter differences in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Nicole R Giuliani; Vince D Calhoun; Godfrey D Pearlson; Alan Francis; Robert W Buchanan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Quantitative prediction of subjective pain intensity from whole-brain fMRI data using Gaussian processes.

Authors:  Andre Marquand; Matthew Howard; Michael Brammer; Carlton Chu; Steven Coen; Janaina Mourão-Miranda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A review of fronto-striatal and fronto-cortical brain abnormalities in children and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and new evidence for dysfunction in adults with ADHD during motivation and attention.

Authors:  Ana Cubillo; Rozmin Halari; Anna Smith; Eric Taylor; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Gray matter volume abnormalities in ADHD: voxel-based meta-analysis exploring the effects of age and stimulant medication.

Authors:  Tomohiro Nakao; Joaquim Radua; Katya Rubia; David Mataix-Cols
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Volumetric MRI differences in treatment-naïve vs chronically treated children with ADHD.

Authors:  Margaret Semrud-Clikeman; Steven R Pliśzka; Jack Lancaster; Mario Liotti
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.

Authors:  M Ullsperger; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Electrophysiological indices of error monitoring in juvenile and adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)--a meta-analytic appraisal.

Authors:  A J Geburek; F Rist; G Gediga; D Stroux; A Pedersen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Fisher discriminative analysis of resting-state brain function for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Chao-Zhe Zhu; Yu-Feng Zang; Qing-Jiu Cao; Chao-Gan Yan; Yong He; Tian-Zi Jiang; Man-Qiu Sui; Yu-Feng Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Extreme learning machine-based classification of ADHD using brain structural MRI data.

Authors:  Xiaolong Peng; Pan Lin; Tongsheng Zhang; Jue Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Classification Accuracy of Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Effects of Sample Size and Circular Analysis.

Authors:  Alfredo A Pulini; Wesley T Kerr; Sandra K Loo; Agatha Lenartowicz
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-06-27

2.  Regional brain network organization distinguishes the combined and inattentive subtypes of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Jacqueline F Saad; Kristi R Griffiths; Michael R Kohn; Simon Clarke; Leanne M Williams; Mayuresh S Korgaonkar
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  Neuronal Intra-Individual Variability Masks Response Selection Differences between ADHD Subtypes-A Need to Change Perspectives.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mohammad R Arbabshirani; Sergey Plis; Jing Sui; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Towards a brain-based predictome of mental illness.

Authors:  Barnaly Rashid; Vince Calhoun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Functional neuroimaging of visuospatial working memory tasks enables accurate detection of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Rubi Hammer; Gillian E Cooke; Mark A Stein; James R Booth
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 7.  Multivariate analyses applied to fetal, neonatal and pediatric MRI of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Jacob Levman; Emi Takahashi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Reduced pain perception in children and adolescents with ADHD is normalized by methylphenidate.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Katya Rubia; Hildtraud Knopf; Heike Hölling; Julia Martini; Stefan Ehrlich; Veit Roessner
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Complexity Analysis of Resting-State fMRI in Adult Patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Brain Entropy.

Authors:  Gülsüm Akdeniz
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12

10.  Comparative meta-analyses of brain structural and functional abnormalities during cognitive control in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Steve Lukito; Luke Norman; Christina Carlisi; Joaquim Radua; Heledd Hart; Emily Simonoff; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.