Literature DB >> 27012503

Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls.

Mohammad R Arbabshirani1, Sergey Plis2, Jing Sui3, Vince D Calhoun4.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging-based single subject prediction of brain disorders has gained increasing attention in recent years. Using a variety of neuroimaging modalities such as structural, functional and diffusion MRI, along with machine learning techniques, hundreds of studies have been carried out for accurate classification of patients with heterogeneous mental and neurodegenerative disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. More than 500 studies have been published during the past quarter century on single subject prediction focused on a multiple brain disorders. In the first part of this study, we provide a survey of more than 200 reports in this field with a focus on schizophrenia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), depressive disorders, autism spectrum disease (ASD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Detailed information about those studies such as sample size, type and number of extracted features and reported accuracy are summarized and discussed. To our knowledge, this is by far the most comprehensive review of neuroimaging-based single subject prediction of brain disorders. In the second part, we present our opinion on major pitfalls of those studies from a machine learning point of view. Common biases are discussed and suggestions are provided. Moreover, emerging trends such as decentralized data sharing, multimodal brain imaging, differential diagnosis, disease subtype classification and deep learning are also discussed. Based on this survey, there is extensive evidence showing the great potential of neuroimaging data for single subject prediction of various disorders. However, the main bottleneck of this exciting field is still the limited sample size, which could be potentially addressed by modern data sharing models such as the ones discussed in this paper. Emerging big data technologies and advanced data-intensive machine learning methodologies such as deep learning have coincided with an increasing need for accurate, robust and generalizable single subject prediction of brain disorders during an exciting time. In this report, we survey the past and offer some opinions regarding the road ahead.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain disorders; Classification; Machine learning; Neuroimaging; Prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27012503      PMCID: PMC5031516          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  337 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; J F Mangin; C Poupon; C A Clark; S Pappata; N Molko; H Chabriat
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Hippocampal volume discriminates between normal cognition; questionable and mild dementia in the elderly.

Authors:  H Wolf; M Grunwald; F Kruggel; S G Riedel-Heller; S Angerhöfer; A Hojjatoleslami; A Hensel; T Arendt; H Gertz
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Prediction of group membership in developmental dyslexia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and normal controls using brain morphometric analysis of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Semrud-Clikeman; S R Hooper; G W Hynd; K Hern; R Presley; T Watson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 4.  The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Ji Wan Park; Brant W Hager; Malcolm V Brock; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  The economic impact of schizophrenia.

Authors:  D P Rice
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Age transformation of combined hippocampus and amygdala volume improves diagnostic accuracy in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Harald Hampel; Stefan J Teipel; Wolfram Bayer; Gene E Alexander; Robert Schwarz; Mark B Schapiro; Stanley I Rapoport; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Annual incidence of Alzheimer disease in the United States projected to the years 2000 through 2050.

Authors:  L E Hebert; L A Beckett; P A Scherr; D A Evans
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.703

8.  Outcome classification of preschool children with autism spectrum disorders using MRI brain measures.

Authors:  Natacha Akshoomoff; Catherine Lord; Alan J Lincoln; Rachel Y Courchesne; Ruth A Carper; Jeanne Townsend; Eric Courchesne
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.829

9.  Volumetric MRI measurements can differentiate Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging.

Authors:  Cássio M C Bottino; Cláudio C Castro; Regina L E Gomes; Carlos A Buchpiguel; Renato L Marchetti; Mário R Louzã Neto
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.878

10.  The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R).

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Doreen Koretz; Kathleen R Merikangas; A John Rush; Ellen E Walters; Philip S Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  220 in total

1.  Transfer learning improves resting-state functional connectivity pattern analysis using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Pál Vakli; Regina J Deák-Meszlényi; Petra Hermann; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 2.  The Original Social Network: White Matter and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Yin Wang; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Diagnostic classification of unipolar depression based on resting-state functional connectivity MRI: effects of generalization to a diverse sample.

Authors:  Benedikt Sundermann; Stephan Feder; Heike Wersching; Anja Teuber; Wolfram Schwindt; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel; Volker Arolt; Klaus Berger; Bettina Pfleiderer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  [Big data approaches in psychiatry: examples in depression research].

Authors:  D Bzdok; T M Karrer; U Habel; F Schneider
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Machine learning in resting-state fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Meenakshi Khosla; Keith Jamison; Gia H Ngo; Amy Kuceyeski; Mert R Sabuncu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia.

Authors:  Olivia Goodkin; Hugh Pemberton; Sjoerd B Vos; Ferran Prados; Carole H Sudre; James Moggridge; M Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Sotirios Bisdas; Mark White; Tarek Yousry; John Thornton; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Treatment-naïve first episode depression classification based on high-order brain functional network.

Authors:  Yanting Zheng; Xiaobo Chen; Danian Li; Yujie Liu; Xin Tan; Yi Liang; Han Zhang; Shijun Qiu; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 8.  Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014-2018.

Authors:  Koji Sakai; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Classification of schizophrenia by intersubject correlation in functional connectome.

Authors:  Gong-Jun Ji; Xingui Chen; Tongjian Bai; Lu Wang; Qiang Wei; Yaxiang Gao; Longxiang Tao; Kongliang He; Dandan Li; Yi Dong; Panpan Hu; Fengqiong Yu; Chunyan Zhu; Yanghua Tian; Yongqiang Yu; Kai Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Harnessing networks and machine learning in neuropsychiatric care.

Authors:  Eli J Cornblath; David M Lydon-Staley; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.