Literature DB >> 21178844

Lumbar decompression using a traditional midline approach versus a tubular retractor system: comparison of patient-based clinical outcomes.

D Greg Anderson1, Amar Patel, Mitchell Maltenfort, Alexander R Vaccaro, John Ratliff, Alan Hilibrand, James S Harrop, Ashwini D Sharan, Ravi K Ponnappan, Jeffrey Rihn, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21178844     DOI： 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db1dfb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN： 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Bilateral Decompression via Microscopic TubularCrossing Laminotomy (MTCL) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Early Surgical Result.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Jin-Sung Kim; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Woo Hur
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.