Literature DB >> 32195424

Risk factors predicting less favorable outcomes in endoscopic lumbar discectomies.

Jeffrey L Katzell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic lumbar discectomy was among the first minimally invasive spine procedures commonly performed. As such, all the benefits of minimal invasion were seen, including less pain, less soft tissue destruction, and faster recovery. While outcomes compare favorably to micro and open discectomy, not all patients fare equally well. This paper examines independent risk factors to assess their correlation to suboptimal outcomes after endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes of 55 consecutive patients treated with endoscopic discectomy between June 2018 and March 2019 by the author. Primary outcome measures were postoperative reductions of visual analog score (VAS) for back and leg pain modified MacNab criteria as well as time to narcotic independence. Risk factors examined included smoking, facet disease, adjacent segments disc degeneration, obesity, alcohol abuse, and psychiatric illness.
RESULTS: There were 31 males and 24 females with a mean age of 41.76±12.53. Most patients suffered from contained herniations (49.1%) followed by extruded herniations (18.2%). Follow-up ranged from 6-18 months. The most common surgical levels were L5-S1 level (30.9%), L4-S1 (29.1%), and L4-5 (25.5%). The mean return to work (RTW) was 23.83±26.01 weeks. The average body mass index (BMI) was 29.11±4.75. The average time for narcotic independence was 9.64±7.29 days. MacNab outcomes showed that 47.3% (26/55) had excellent, 36.4% good (20/55), 12.7% fair (7/55), and 3.6% had poor (2/55), respectively. The VAS scores for the back (7.69 to 2.65) and leg (6.78 to 2.65) pain reduced significantly (P<0.0001). Smoking (P=0.048), psychiatric disease (P=0.029), disc herniations larger than 10 mm, facet disease, obesity (BMI >30), diabetes, and alcohol abuse was associated with fair and poor MacNab outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic lumbar discectomy safely and reliably reduces axial pain and radiculopathy from lumbar disc herniations. Risk factors associated with incomplete pain relief are large herniations, obesity, instability, smoking, advanced facet degeneration, and decreased ability to cope with the surgery. 2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic discectomy; outcome; risk factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 32195424      PMCID: PMC7063323          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  34 in total

Review 1.  In-vivo endoscopic visualization of patho-anatomy in painful degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony T Yeung; Christopher A Yeung
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2006

2.  Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery.

Authors:  John E O'Toole; Kurt M Eichholz; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-10

Review 3.  Economic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Christoph P Hofstetter; Anna S Hofer; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 4.  Multimodal analgesia as an alternative to the risks of opioid monotherapy in surgical pain management.

Authors:  John J Savarese; Norman G Tabler
Journal:  J Healthc Risk Manag       Date:  2017-07

Review 5.  Multimodal analgesia: A systematic review of local NSAIDs for non-ophthalmologic postoperative pain management.

Authors:  Lisa Brubaker; Lauren Kendall; Eva Reina
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 6.071

6.  Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure.

Authors:  Paul M Tsou; Christopher Alan Yeung; Anthony T Yeung
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Multimodal anesthesia with the addition of methadone is superior to epidural analgesia: A retrospective comparison of intraoperative anesthetic techniques and pain management for 124 pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure.

Authors:  Neil R Singhal; John Jones; Janet Semenova; Amber Williamson; Katelyn McCollum; Dennis Tong; Jonathan Jerman; David M Notrica; Hayden Nguyen
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Transforaminal endoscopic decompression for radiculopathy secondary to intracanal noncontained lumbar disc herniations: outcome and technique.

Authors:  Paul Moody Tsou; Anthony Tung Yeung
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Comparative Effectiveness and Economic Evaluations of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Frank M Phillips; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Benny Borgman; Simona Vertuani; Jonas Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Value of Lumbar MRI Parameters in the Evaluation of Postoperative Curative Effect on Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation and Analysis of Risk Factors.

Authors:  Danguo Chen; Shengquan He
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Ivo Abraham; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Albert E Telfeian; Morgan P Lorio; Stefan Hellinger; Martin Knight; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho; Max Rogério Freitas Ramos; Álvaro Dowling; Manuel Rodriguez Garcia; Fauziyya Muhammad; Namath Hussain; Vicky Yamamoto; Babak Kateb; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.