Literature DB >> 25606549

Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation.

Maristella F Saccomanno1, Carmine DE Ieso1, Giuseppe Milano1.   

Abstract

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint instability is a common source of pain and disability. The injury is most commonly a result of a direct impact to the AC joint. The AC joint is surrounded by a capsule and has an intra-articular synovium and an articular cartilage interface. An articular disc is usually present in the joint, but this varies in size and shape. The AC joint capsule is quite thin, but has considerable ligamentous support; there are four AC ligaments: superior, inferior, anterior and posterior. The coracoclavicular (CC) ligament complex consists of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments. They insert on the posteromedial and anterolateral region of the undersurface of the distal clavicle, respectively. The coracoid origin of the trapezoid covers the posterior half of the coracoid dorsum; the conoid origin is more posterior on the base of the coracoid. Several biomechanical studies showed that horizontal stability of the AC joint is mediated by the AC ligaments while vertical stability is mediated by the CC ligaments. The radiographic classification of AC joint injuries described by Rockwood includes six types: in type I injuries the AC ligaments are sprained, but the joint is intact; in type II injuries, the AC ligaments are torn, but the CC ligaments are intact; in type III injuries both the AC and the CC ligaments are torn; type IV injuries are characterized by complete dislocation with posterior displacement of the distal clavicle into or through the fascia of the trapezius; type V injuries are characterized by a greater degree of soft tissue damage; type VI injuries are inferior AC joint dislocations into a subacromial or subcoracoid position. The diagnosis of AC joint instability can be based on historical data, physical examination and imaging studies. The cross body adduction stress test has the greatest sensitivity, followed by the AC resisted extension test and the O'Brien test. Proper radiographic evaluation of the AC joint is necessary. The Zanca view is the most accurate view for examining the AC joint. The axial view of the shoulder is important in differentiating a type III AC joint injury from a type IV injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromioclavicular joint; biomechanics; clinical evaluation; injury; instability

Year:  2014        PMID: 25606549      PMCID: PMC4295671          DOI: 10.11138/jts/2014.2.2.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joints        ISSN: 2512-9090


  36 in total

1.  Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics.

Authors:  R E Debski; I M Parsons; S L Woo; F H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  SURGICAL ANATOMY OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR AND STERNOCLAVICULAR JOINTS.

Authors:  A F DEPALMA
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  A biomechanical analysis of the native coracoclavicular ligaments and their influence on a new reconstruction using a coracoid tunnel and free tendon graft.

Authors:  Yonsik S Yoo; Andrew G Tsai; Anil S Ranawat; Mohit Bansal; Freddie H Fu; Mark W Rodosky; Patrick Smolinski
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Acromioclavicular joint injury: enhanced technique of examination with dynamic maneuver.

Authors:  Philippe Peetrons; Justine P Bédard
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability.

Authors:  Patrick A Dawson; Gregory J Adamson; Marilyn M Pink; Matthew Kornswiet; Steven Lin; James A Shankwiler; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Complete acromioclavicular dislocation.

Authors:  B M BOSWORTH
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1949-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Biomechanics of the coracoclavicular ligament complex and augmentations used in its repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  A R Motamedi; F T Blevins; M C Willis; T P McNally; M Shahinpoor
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  MR imaging of the intraarticular disk of the acromioclavicular joint: a comparison with anatomical, histological and in-vivo findings.

Authors:  Guido Heers; Jürgen Götz; Thomas Schubert; Henrik Schachner; Ulrich Neumaier; Joachim Grifka; Achim Hedtmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Ryan S Costic; Joanne E Labriola; Mark W Rodosky; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Degeneration of the acromioclavicular joint. A morphological study.

Authors:  C J Petersson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1983-06
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  [Current aspects and new techniques in dislocation of the shoulder joint].

Authors:  J Abel; M A Zumstein; L Bolliger; M O Schär
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sircana; Maristella F Saccomanno; Fabrizio Mocini; Vincenzo Campana; Piermarco Messinese; Andrea Monteleone; Andrea Salvi; Alessandra Scaini; Almerico Megaro; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Effectiveness of arthroscopic distal clavicle resection for symptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis].

Authors:  Qingjun Yang; Wenqian Lu; Tian You; Xintao Zhang; Wentao Zhang; Canfeng Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Comparing mini-open and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint repair: functional results and return to sport.

Authors:  M Faggiani; G P Vasario; L Mattei; M J Calò; F Castoldi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

5.  New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Philippe Schiessl; Benedikt Ambuehl; Lilianna Bolliger; Johannes Weihs; Martin H Maurer; Beat K Moor; Michael Schaer; Sumit Raniga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Repair Through Open Ligament Transfer and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation.

Authors:  Ricardo Canquerini da Silva; Bruno Silveira Pavei; Márcio B Ferrari; George Sanchez; Luiza Barbosa Horta Barbosa; João L Ellera Gomes
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-08-07

7.  Management of acromioclavicular joint disease by manual therapy versus corticosteroid injections: the protocol of a non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Alexia Michaut; Lucie Planche; Lucie Auzanneau; Grégoire Cormier
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Acromioclavicular Joint Disk Tearing in Young Non-Arthritic Individuals: A Case Series.

Authors:  Andrew W Kuhn; John E Kuhn; Scott M LaTulip; James E Carpenter
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2020 May-Jun

Review 9.  Ultrasound-guided interventions for painful shoulder: from anatomy to evidence.

Authors:  Ke-Vin Chang; Kamal Mezian; Ondřej Naňka; Wei-Ting Wu; Chih-Peng Lin; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Analysis of the bony geometry of the acromio-clavicular joint.

Authors:  Moritz Crönlein; Lukas Postl; Marc Beirer; Dominik Pförringer; Jennifer Lang; Frederik Greve; Michael Müller; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.