Literature DB >> 10843132

Biomechanics of the coracoclavicular ligament complex and augmentations used in its repair and reconstruction.

A R Motamedi1, F T Blevins, M C Willis, T P McNally, M Shahinpoor.   

Abstract

Augmentation is a well-accepted and common component of coracoclavicular ligament repairs and reconstructions. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the strength, stiffness, and mode of failure of the coracoclavicular ligament complex and four different augmentation techniques in cadaveric shoulders. There was no significant difference in the mean failure load between the intact ligament complex (724.9+/-230.9 N) and augmentations performed with braided polydioxanone (PDS) (676.7+/-115.4 N) or braided polyethylene placed through (986.1+/-391.1 N) or around (762.7+/-218.2 N) the clavicle. The mean failure load for augmentations using a 6.5-mm cancellous screw through the clavicle and into a single cortex of the coracoid (390.1+/-253.6 N) was significantly lower than that for the intact coracoclavicular ligaments. There was no difference in mean stiffness between the intact coracoclavicular ligament complex (115.9+/-36.2 N/mm) and the braided polyethylene augmentations placed through (99.8+/-22.2 N/mm) or around (90.0+/-25.5 N/mm) the clavicle. Polydioxanone augmentations were significantly less stiff (27.4+/-3.3 N/mm) than the intact complex, while screw augmentations were significantly stiffer (250.4+/-88.2 N/mm). There were no significant differences in strength or stiffness of braided polyethylene reconstructions placed around or through a drill hole in the clavicle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10843132     DOI: 10.1177/03635465000280031701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  31 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular PDS augmentation for complete AC joint dislocation showed insufficient properties in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Arne Buchholz; Gunther Sandmann; Sebastian Siebenlist; Stefan Döbele; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Ulrich Stöckle; Peter J Millett; Florian Elser; Andreas Lenich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Suspension suture augmentation for repair of coracoclavicular ligament disruptions.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Kuo-Chung Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biomechanics of a new technique for minimal-invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Simon Lenschow; Peter Schürmann; Mike Schroeglmann; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Kösters; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Epidemiology, anatomy, biomechanics and imaging of acromioclavicular joint injuries].

Authors:  M Wellmann; T Smith
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Ryan J Warth; Frank Martetschläger; Trevor R Gaskill; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

Review 9.  Comparison of surgical outcomes between fixation with hook plate and loop suspensory fixation for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alisara Arirachakaran; Manusak Boonard; Peerapong Piyapittayanun; Vajarin Phiphobmongkol; Kornkit Chaijenkij; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-22

10.  Bone Osteolysis Following Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using Synthetic Ligament (Surgilig™).

Authors:  Praveen Sarda; Andrew M Richards; Steven A Corbett
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2013-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.