Literature DB >> 25604307

[Operation time for suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial].

J Hipp1, J Laniewski, E Gitei, S Elhabash, O Akkermann, B Gerdes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade new innovative minimally invasive techniques (e.g. transvaginal cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been developed to reduce operative trauma, postoperative pain and to achieve better cosmetic results. Nevertheless, most of these techniques are more difficult and time-consuming than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). A new approach, the Minden technique for combined suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy (MI-CHE) has been proven to provide a very good cosmetic outcome with reduced operative trauma. The aim of this study was to survey whether MI-CHE prolongs operation times to a relevant degree compared to CLC.
METHODS: A total of 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized between both techniques. The duration of the operation and other perioperative data were recorded. Surgery was performed by four resident surgeons who had not yet performed any technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, neither MI-CHE nor CLC but were assisted by the same senior staff surgeon in all cases. The two patient groups showed no differences in age, gender and body mass index. The study was registered (DRKS00003271). Non-inferiority was tested using 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
RESULTS: The mean operation time was shorter by - 4.2 min (95% CI, + 6.4 min to - 14.8 min) in the MI-CHE as compared to the CLC group (65.5 min versus 69.7 min). There were no open conversions but in one patient intestinal injury occurred during the umbilical mini-laparotomy. There were no differences in patient satisfaction and perioperative pain between both procedures.
CONCLUSION: The MI-CHE, which provides very good cosmetic results, is not more time-consuming than CLC. Additionally, it seems to be safe and not more difficult to learn than CLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25604307     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-014-2958-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  27 in total

1.  The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J Voitk; S G Tsao; S Ignatius
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Prakash; G Jacob; V Lekha; A Venugopal; B Venugopal; H Ramesh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Changing trends in the management of gallstone disease.

Authors:  S M Johnston; S Kidney; K J Sweeney; A Zaki; W A Tanner; F V Keane
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [A new cholecystectomy with no visible scarring and low risk. A possible alternative to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery].

Authors:  K Bachmann; J R Izbicki; T Strate
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

Review 6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Nikhil Ladwa; Lorain Kalra; Kristian K Hutson; Krishna K Singh; Mazin Sayegh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve.

Authors:  Daniel Solomon; Robert L Bell; Andrew J Duffy; Kurt E Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment.

Authors:  R W Luijendijk; J Jeekel; R K Storm; P J Schutte; W C Hop; A C Drogendijk; F J Huikeshoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Parakseva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  1 in total

1.  Suprapubic Cholecystectomy Improves Cosmetic Outcome Compared to Classic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Anas Taha; Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz; Ulrich Sternkopf; Elena Sorba; Bassey Enodien; Stephan Vorburger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.