Literature DB >> 12582753

Changing trends in the management of gallstone disease.

S M Johnston1, S Kidney, K J Sweeney, A Zaki, W A Tanner, F V Keane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Day case cholecystectomy is increasingly becoming a management option for elective cases while "same admission" cholecystectomy is now considered a favorable option in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. To assess the advent of these changes in our surgical practice, a retrospective analysis of our experience is presented.
METHODS: All patients undergoing cholecystectomy between January 2000 and January 2001 were analyzed according to admission status, operation type, conversion rate, complications, and nonsurgical intervention.
RESULTS: 156 patients underwent cholecystectomy and 152 charts were retrieved. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed on 95% of patients with a conversion rate of 9%. Morbidity for the series was 12.5%, including one common bile duct injury (0.6%). Day case and acute cholecystectomy comprised 67% of our cholecystectomy practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that there is an increasing trend toward shortening the hospital stay of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This does not appear to have had a deleterious effect on outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12582753     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9122-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi; J J Tuech; L Braconier; H K Walsøe; R Mårvik; J Boyet; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a safe procedure.

Authors:  P C Willsher; J R Sanabria; S Gallinger; L Rossi; S Strasberg; D E Litwin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evaluating the effect of decreasing length of stay.

Authors:  S Woods
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-08

Review 4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  J Svanvik
Journal:  Eur J Surg Suppl       Date:  2000

5.  Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; A Quereshi; J Coleman; R Keane; G McEntee; P Broe; H Osborne; D Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  F A Habib; R B Kolachalam; R Khilnani; O Preventza; V K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Hollington; G J Toogood; R T Padbury
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-12

Review 8.  Economics of surgery.

Authors:  J E Brazier; A G Johnson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. A prospective comparative study in patients with acute vs. chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  P Pessaux; J J Tuech; C Rouge; R Duplessis; C Cervi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Audit of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Universities of Melbourne HPB Group.

Authors:  W R Fleming; I Michell; M Douglas
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons' preference for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Shih-Horng Tseng; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chih-Hung Hsu; Dev-Aur Chou; Hurng-Sheng Wu; Min-Ho Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Authors:  Wu Ji; Ling-Tang Li; Zhi-Ming Wang; Zhu-Fu Quan; Xun-Ru Chen; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  [Operation time for suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial].

Authors:  J Hipp; J Laniewski; E Gitei; S Elhabash; O Akkermann; B Gerdes
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Z Ahmad; G Byrnes; S A Naqvi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Does laparoscopic surgery spell the end of the open surgeon?

Authors:  Riaz Agha; Gordon Muir
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 18.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.