Literature DB >> 23073688

Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.

Philip H Pucher1, Mikael H Sodergren, Pritam Singh, Ara Darzi, Paraskevas Parakseva.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) represents the next step in laparoscopic surgery in further reducing the invasiveness of surgical procedures with cosmetic advantages. Recalling the increased rates of major complications at the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy 20 years ago, however, it is clear that appropriate training is required before adopting a new technique. This study aims to review the current evidence for training and skills acquisition for SILS.
METHODS: A comprehensive database search of PubMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar was carried out. Studies considered for inclusion were those addressing SILS learning curves, skills acquisition, or training.
RESULTS: 21 studies were included in the final analysis. Ten clinical case series with analysis of SILS learning curve demonstrated a significant learning curve for conventional multiport laparoscopic (LAP)-trained surgeons over the course of initial SILS cases, with several studies reporting increased risk of conversion and complication rates. Five laboratory-based studies demonstrated differences in SILS skills acquisition compared with LAP. Six studies describing SILS-specific training curricula were analysed, but none included a robust validation of the curriculum.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical case series and laboratory-based skills acquisition studies demonstrate the unique requirements of SILS, with skill sets and ergonomic demands which cannot be directly adapted from existing LAP experience. Some studies have already reported higher complication rates in initial SILS cases. To avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, the implementation of an evidence- and competency-based SILS curriculum is necessary to ensure appropriate training of future SILS surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073688     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

1.  Novice surgeons versus experienced surgeons in laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery: a comparison of performances in a surgical simulator.

Authors:  Leonidas Alevizos; Willem Brinkman; Abe Fingerhut; Jack Jakimowicz; Emmanuel Leandros
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A matched-pair comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by a single urologist.

Authors:  Linhui Wang; Bing Liu; Zhenjie Wu; Qing Yang; Wei Chen; Zunli Xu; Cheng Wang; Liang Xiao; Fubo Wang; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery in general surgery: a review.

Authors:  N Greaves; J Nicholson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Arnold P Advincula; Monish Aron; Jeffrey Caddedu; David Canes; Paul G Curcillo; Mihir M Desai; John C Evanko; Tomasso Falcone; Victor Fazio; Matthew Gettman; Andrew A Gumbs; Georges-Pascal Haber; Jihad H Kaouk; Fernando Kim; Stephanie A King; Jeffrey Ponsky; Feza Remzi; Homero Rivas; Alexander Rosemurgy; Sharona Ross; Philip Schauer; Rene Sotelo; Jose Speranza; John Sweeney; Julio Teixeira
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Navarra; E Pozza; S Occhionorelli; P Carcoforo; I Donini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Learning curve analysis for laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Park; Kyung Don Baik; Young Ju Lee; Kwang Taek Kim; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  The learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy: definable, short, and safe.

Authors:  Jonathan Hernandez; Sharona Ross; Connor Morton; Kellie McFarlin; Sujat Dahal; Farhaad Golkar; Michael Albrink; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  M Johansson; A Thune; L Nelvin; M Stiernstam; B Westman; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Ryan P Merkow; Heidi Nelson; Edward Wang; Clifford Y Ko; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Ex-vivo training model for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Sashi S Kommu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.407

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Review of single incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Nisreen Madhoun; Deborah S Keller; Eric M Haas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

3.  Acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills is different comparing conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a single-centre, prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Scott Michael Ellis; Martin Varley; Stuart Howell; Markus Trochsler; Guy Maddern; Peter Hewett; Tina Runge; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Learning lessons for the future: assessments of demand and benefit are required in addition to training in single incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Paraskevas Parakseva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  W Konrad Karcz; William von Braun
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-08

6.  A new experimental model of calculous cholecystitis suitable for the evaluation and training of minimally invasive approaches to cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ondrej Ryska; Zuzana Serclova; Jan Martinek; Radek Dolezel; Jaroslav Kalvach; Stefan Juhas; Jana Juhasova; Bohus Bunganic; Eva Laszikova; Miroslav Ryska
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Prospective randomized assessment of acquisition and retention of SILS skills after simulation training.

Authors:  Martin Varley; Ryan Choi; Kean Kuan; Neil Bhardwaj; Markus Trochsler; Guy Maddern; Peter Hewett; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli; Ray Price; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Influencing factors for port-site hernias after single-incision laparoscopy.

Authors:  F P Buckley; H E Vassaur; D C Jupiter; J H Crosby; C J Wheeless; J L Vassaur
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional multiple-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chi-Wen Lo; Stephen Shei-Dei Yang; Yao-Chou Tsai; Cheng-Hsing Hsieh; Shang-Jen Chang
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.