Sébastien Simard1, Josée Savard. 1. Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), 2725, Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec, G1V 4G5, QC, Canada, sebastien.simard@criucpq.ulaval.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The prevalence of clinical levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in cancer survivors is unknown, which may be partly explained by the lack of an assessment method that would make it possible to distinguish between normal and clinical levels of FCR. Moreover, despite the apparent overlap between FCR and manifestations of some psychiatric disorders, no study has yet evaluated the comorbidity of clinical levels of FCR. The goals of this study were to assess the capacity of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory severity subscale, to consider a shorter form of the FCRI (FCRI-SF), to screen for clinical levels of FCR, and to assess its psychiatric comorbidity. METHODS: Sixty French-Canadian cancer survivors (73% of those eligible) who had been treated within the past 4 years for localized breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer were randomly selected. Participants were administered a clinical interview assessing FCR, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, and self-report scales. RESULTS: A cutoff score of 13 or higher on the FCRI-SF was associated with optimal sensitivity (88%) and specificity (75%) rates for the screening of clinical levels of FCR. Cancer survivors with clinical levels of FCR were significantly more likely to meet the criteria for a current psychiatric disorder (60%) than patients with nonclinical levels (29%). Anxiety disorders tended to be the most common comorbid disorders. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The FCRI-SF allows rapid and effective screening of clinical levels of FCR, a condition associated with significant psychiatric comorbidity.
PURPOSE: The prevalence of clinical levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in cancer survivors is unknown, which may be partly explained by the lack of an assessment method that would make it possible to distinguish between normal and clinical levels of FCR. Moreover, despite the apparent overlap between FCR and manifestations of some psychiatric disorders, no study has yet evaluated the comorbidity of clinical levels of FCR. The goals of this study were to assess the capacity of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory severity subscale, to consider a shorter form of the FCRI (FCRI-SF), to screen for clinical levels of FCR, and to assess its psychiatric comorbidity. METHODS: Sixty French-Canadian cancer survivors (73% of those eligible) who had been treated within the past 4 years for localized breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer were randomly selected. Participants were administered a clinical interview assessing FCR, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, and self-report scales. RESULTS: A cutoff score of 13 or higher on the FCRI-SF was associated with optimal sensitivity (88%) and specificity (75%) rates for the screening of clinical levels of FCR. Cancer survivors with clinical levels of FCR were significantly more likely to meet the criteria for a current psychiatric disorder (60%) than patients with nonclinical levels (29%). Anxiety disorders tended to be the most common comorbid disorders. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The FCRI-SF allows rapid and effective screening of clinical levels of FCR, a condition associated with significant psychiatric comorbidity.
Authors: Diana Zwahlen; Niels Hagenbuch; Margaret I Carley; Christopher J Recklitis; Stefan Buchi Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kristina L Mirabeau-Beale; Alice B Kornblith; Richard T Penson; Hang Lee; Annekathryn Goodman; Susana M Campos; Linda Duska; Lauren Pereira; Jessica Bryan; Ursula A Matulonis Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-05-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Lynne I Wagner; Jenna Duffecy; Mark Begale; David Victorson; Shannon L Golden; Mary Lou Smith; Frank J Penedo; David C Mohr; David Cella Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Lahiru Russell; Anna Ugalde; Liliana Orellana; Donna Milne; Meinir Krishnasamy; Richard Chambers; David W Austin; Patricia M Livingston Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Emily C Soriano; Amy K Otto; Stefanie T LoSavio; Christine Perndorfer; Scott D Siegel; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2021-03-20
Authors: Allan 'Ben' Smith; Louise Sharpe; Belinda Thewes; Jane Turner; Jemma Gilchrist; Joanna E Fardell; Afaf Girgis; Stephanie Tesson; Joseph Descallar; Melanie L Bell; Jane Beith; Phyllis Butow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Tenbroeck G Smith; Sara Strollo; Xin Hu; Craig C Earle; Corinne R Leach; Larissa Nekhlyudov Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mbathio Dieng; Nadine A Kasparian; Anne E Cust; Daniel S J Costa; Anh Tran; Phyllis N Butow; Scott W Menzies; Graham J Mann; Rachael L Morton Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Salene M W Jones; Rebecca Ziebell; Rod Walker; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Borsika A Rabin; Stephanie Nutt; Monica Fujii; Jessica Chubak Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amy K Otto; Emily C Soriano; Scott D Siegel; Stefanie T LoSavio; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Nadine A Kasparian; Shab Mireskandari; Phyllis N Butow; Mbathio Dieng; Anne E Cust; Bettina Meiser; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Scott Menzies; Graham J Mann Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 3.603