Literature DB >> 18203146

Screening cancer patients' families with the distress thermometer (DT): a validation study.

Diana Zwahlen1, Niels Hagenbuch, Margaret I Carley, Christopher J Recklitis, Stefan Buchi.   

Abstract

Although family members of cancer patients are at great risk of experiencing psychological distress, clinical tools to assist with recognizing and intervening with appropriate psychosocial care are sparse. This study reports on the first validation of the distress thermometer (DT) as a screening instrument for symptoms of depression and anxiety in family members of cancer patients. The DT was administered with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a sample of 321 family members. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) demonstrated that the DT has good diagnostic utility relative to the HADS (area under the curve= 0.88 relative to the HADS anxiety scale; 0.84 relative to the HADS depression scale, respectively). The ROC curves indicate that using a cut-off of 4/5 maximizes sensitivity (86.2% HADS anxiety scale; 88.2% HADS depression scale) and specificity (71.2% HADS anxiety scale; 67.6% HADS depression scale); however, the alternative lower cut-off of 3/4 increases sensitivity (94.1% for both scales) and hence reduces the risk of missing distressed family members (specificity is 62.9% for HADS anxiety scale; 59.1% for HADS depression scale). The results offer validation of the DT for screening family members of cancer patients and support its use for clinical assessment. Distress screening with DT for family members of cancer patients is a promising and efficient approach to integrating family members in the program of care and provides the first step toward meeting their unmet needs with referral for supportive services. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18203146     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  44 in total

1.  Guidelines for the psychosocial and bereavement support of family caregivers of palliative care patients.

Authors:  Peter Hudson; Cheryl Remedios; Rachel Zordan; Kristina Thomas; Di Clifton; Michael Crewdson; Christopher Hall; Tom Trauer; Amanda Bolleter; David M Clarke; Catherine Bauld
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Do carer's levels of unmet needs change over time when caring for patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and how are these needs correlated with distress?

Authors:  G K B Halkett; E A Lobb; T Shaw; M M Sinclair; L Miller; E Hovey; A K Nowak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The diagnostic role of a short screening tool--the distress thermometer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuelei Ma; Jing Zhang; Wuning Zhong; Chi Shu; Fengtian Wang; Jianing Wen; Min Zhou; Yaxiong Sang; Yu Jiang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Silent Partners to Cancer Patients: Formal Caregivers and Oncologists.

Authors:  G Goldzweig; Yakir Rottenberg; Tamar Peretz; Lea Baider
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  The impact of lung cancer surgery on quality of life trajectories in patients and family caregivers.

Authors:  Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun; Dan J Raz; Anna Cathy Williams; Rebecca Fujinami; Karen Reckamp; Marianna Koczywas; Mihaela Cristea; Arti Hurria; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Can the distress thermometer (DT) identify significant psychological distress in long-term cancer survivors? A comparison with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18).

Authors:  Anna Merport; Sharon L Bober; Amy Grose; Christopher J Recklitis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Distress and psychological morbidity do not reduce over time in carers of patients with high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Georgia K B Halkett; Elizabeth A Lobb; Thèrése Shaw; Michelle M Sinclair; Lisa Miller; Elizabeth Hovey; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The effectiveness of the Screening Inventory of Psychosocial Problems (SIPP) in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anna P B M Braeken; Lilian Lechner; Francis C J M van Gils; Ruud M A Houben; Daniëlle Eekers; Ton Ambergen; Gertrudis I J M Kempen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers.

Authors:  Anna L Hawkes; Karen L Hughes; Sandy D Hutchison; Suzanne K Chambers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.