| Literature DB >> 25602282 |
Songzhi Xu1, Dezhu Li2, Jianwu Li3, Xiaoguo Xiang1, Weitao Jin1, Weichang Huang4, Xiaohua Jin1, Luqi Huang5.
Abstract
DNA barcoding has been proposed to be one of the most promising tools for accurate and rapid identification of taxa. However, few publications have evaluated the efficiency of DNA barcoding for the large genera of flowering plants. Dendrobium, one of the largest genera of flowering plants, contains many species that are important in horticulture, medicine and biodiversity conservation. Besides, Dendrobium is a notoriously difficult group to identify. DNA barcoding was expected to be a supplementary means for species identification, conservation and future studies in Dendrobium. We assessed the power of 11 candidate barcodes on the basis of 1,698 accessions of 184 Dendrobium species obtained primarily from mainland Asia. Our results indicated that five single barcodes, i.e., ITS, ITS2, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA, can be easily amplified and sequenced with the currently established primers. Four barcodes, ITS, ITS2, ITS+matK, and ITS2+matK, have distinct barcoding gaps. ITS+matK was the optimal barcode based on all evaluation methods. Furthermore, the efficiency of ITS+matK was verified in four other large genera including Ficus, Lysimachia, Paphiopedilum, and Pedicularis in this study. Therefore, we tentatively recommend the combination of ITS+matK as a core DNA barcode for large flowering plant genera.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25602282 PMCID: PMC4300225 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
A list of primers used for PCR and sequence in this study.
| region | primer | Sequence (5′-3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| rbcL | 1F | ATG TCA CCA CAA ACA GAA AC | [ |
| 1360R | CTT CAC AAG CAG CAG CTA GTT C | ||
| matK | 390F | CGA TCT ATT CAT TCA ATA TTT C | [ |
| 1326R | TCT AGC ACA CGA AAG TCG AAG T | ||
| ITS | 17SE | ACG AAT TCA TGG TCC GGT GAA GTG TTC G | [ |
| 26SE | TAG AAT TCC CCG GTT CGC TCG CCG TTA C | ||
| trnH-psbA | trnH | CGC GCA TGG TGG ATT CAC AAT CC | [ |
| psbA | GTT ATG CAT GAACGT AAT GCT C |
Evaluation of six DNA markers and combinations of the markers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universality of primers | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Percentage PCR success (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Percentage sequencing success (%) | 96.77 | 96.77 | 97.42 | 100 | 49.68 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Length of aligned sequence (bp) | 857 | 312 | 833 | 1297 | 1460 | 1690 | 1145 | 2130 | 2267 | 2243 | 3050 |
| No. of parsimony informative sites/variable sites | 129/146 | 49/50 | 55/79 | 0/0 | 34/47 | 283/312 | 147/171 | 81/117 | 254/287 | 82/99 | 341/388 |
| No. of species samples (individuals) | 166(664) | 166(664) | 105(431) | 108(373) | 86(230) | 91(406) | 91(406) | 100(354) | 80(222) | 68(185) | 67(183) |
| Ability to discriminate (NJ) | 31.93% | 22.29% | 10.48% | 5.56% | 8.14% | 76.92% | 64.84% | 24% | 60% | 25% | 73.13% |
Summary of the pairwise intraspecific and interspecific distances in the barcode loci of Dendrobium species.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ITS | 0 | 4.91 | 0.52 | 0 | 24.5 | 10.4 |
| ITS2 | 0 | 8.29 | 0.85 | 0 | 61 | 21.6 |
| matK | 0 | 1.14 | 0.08 | 0 | 10.1 | 1.4 |
| rbcL | 0 | 0.92 | 0.08 | 0 | 4.9 | 1.1 |
| trnH-psbA | 0 | 1.14 | 0.17 | 0 | 3.2 | 0.8 |
| ITS+matK | 0 | 2.09 | 0.30 | 0 | 17.2 | 8.3 |
| ITS2+matK | 0 | 3.42 | 0.31 | 0 | 17.4 | 7 |
| matK+rbcL | 0 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0 | 5.3 | 1.1 |
| ITS+trnH-psbA | 0 | 1.57 | 0.32 | 0 | 11.6 | 6.2 |
| matK+trnH-psbA | 0 | 0.84 | 0.15 | 0 | 4.4 | 0.8 |
| ITS+matK+trnH-psbA | 0 | 1.55 | 0.31 | 0 | 10.5 | 5.5 |
Figure 1Distribution of intra- and inter-specific Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) distances among all samples for the five candidate loci and their combinations.
Identification success based on the ‘best match’, ‘best close match’ and ‘all species barcodes’ function of the program TaxonDNA.
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ITS | 77.71 | 6.02 | 16.26 | 77.1 | 5.87 | 8.73 | 56.47 | 33.13 | 2.1 |
| ITS2 | 72.28 | 13.25 | 14.45 | 71.53 | 12.5 | 7.68 | 56.62 | 33.28 | 1.8 |
|
| 49.18 | 42.45 | 8.35 | 49.18 | 42.45 | 8.35 | 51.97 | 44.54 | 3.47 |
|
| 17.69 | 74.53 | 7.77 | 17.69 | 74.53 | 7.77 | 47.18 | 47.98 | 4.82 |
|
| 43.47 | 29.13 | 27.39 | 43.47 | 29.13 | 27.39 | 8.26 | 89.56 | 2.17 |
| ITS+ | 91.62 | 1.23 | 7.14 | 91.62 | 1.23 | 4.67 | 72.16 | 22.66 | 2.7 |
| ITS2+ | 90.88 | 2.46 | 6.65 | 90.88 | 2.21 | 4.92 | 69.7 | 25.86 | 2.46 |
|
| 71.46 | 17.23 | 11.29 | 71.46 | 17.23 | 11.29 | 46.04 | 50.28 | 3.67 |
| ITS+ | 82.88 | 1.35 | 15.76 | 82.43 | 1.35 | 9.0 | 28.64 | 41.44 | 2.7 |
|
| 68.1 | 7.56 | 24.32 | 68.1 | 7.56 | 24.32 | 22.16 | 74.05 | 3.78 |
| ITS+ | 86.33 | 0.54 | 13.11 | 86.33 | 0.54 | 3.27 | 45.9 | 46.44 | 4.37 |
Figure 2Neighbor joining (NJ) tree generated using ITS+matK sequences of Dendrobium.
Bootstrap values (>50%) are shown above the relevant branches. Corresponding clades are color-coded. Unresolved species according to recent phylogeny research are highlighted in black. More details are presented in Figure S6 in S1 File.
Figure 3The relationship between number of samples and species identification success rate based on neighbor joining (NJ) tree using ITS+matK sequences of Dendrobium.