Literature DB >> 30825008

Machine learning approaches outperform distance- and tree-based methods for DNA barcoding of Pterocarpus wood.

Tuo He1,2,3,4, Lichao Jiao1,2, Alex C Wiedenhoeft3,4,5,6, Yafang Yin7,8.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: Machine-learning approaches (MLAs) for DNA barcoding outperform distance- and tree-based methods on identification accuracy and cost-effectiveness to arrive at species-level identification of wood. DNA barcoding is a promising tool to combat illegal logging and associated trade, and the development of reliable and efficient analytical methods is essential for its extensive application in the trade of wood and in the forensics of natural materials more broadly. In this study, 120 DNA sequences of four barcodes (ITS2, matK, ndhF-rpl32, and rbcL) generated in our previous study and 85 downloaded from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) were collected to establish a reference data set for six commercial Pterocarpus woods. MLAs (BLOG, BP-neural network, SMO and J48) were compared with distance- (TaxonDNA) and tree-based (NJ tree) methods based on identification accuracy and cost-effectiveness across these six species, and also were applied to discriminate the CITES-listed species Pterocarpus santalinus from its anatomically similar species P. tinctorius for forensic identification. MLAs provided higher identification accuracy (30.8-100%) than distance- (15.1-97.4%) and tree-based methods (11.1-87.5%), with SMO performing the best among the machine learning classifiers. The two-locus combination ITS2 + matK when using SMO classifier exhibited the highest resolution (100%) with the fewest barcodes for discriminating the six Pterocarpus species. The CITES-listed species P. santalinus was discriminated successfully from P. tinctorius using MLAs with a single barcode, ndhF-rpl32. This study shows that MLAs provided higher identification accuracy and cost-effectiveness for forensic application over other analytical methods in DNA barcoding of Pterocarpus wood.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA barcoding; Forensic wood identification; Identification accuracy; Machine learning approaches (MLAs); Pterocarpus; SMO classifier

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30825008     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-019-03116-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  48 in total

Review 1.  Increasing human dominance of tropical forests.

Authors:  Simon L Lewis; David P Edwards; David Galbraith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A DNA barcode for land plants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation.

Authors:  Howard A Ross; Sumathi Murugan; Wai Lok Sibon Li
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Inferring species membership using DNA sequences with back-propagation neural networks.

Authors:  A B Zhang; D S Sikes; C Muster; S Q Li
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents.

Authors:  Sassan S Saatchi; Nancy L Harris; Sandra Brown; Michael Lefsky; Edward T A Mitchard; William Salas; Brian R Zutta; Wolfgang Buermann; Simon L Lewis; Stephen Hagen; Silvia Petrova; Lee White; Miles Silman; Alexandra Morel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The real maccoyii: identifying tuna sushi with DNA barcodes--contrasting characteristic attributes and genetic distances.

Authors:  Jacob H Lowenstein; George Amato; Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Forensic timber identification: a case study of a CITES listed species, Gonystylus bancanus (Thymelaeaceae).

Authors:  Kevin Kit Siong Ng; Soon Leong Lee; Lee Hong Tnah; Zakaria Nurul-Farhanah; Chin Hong Ng; Chai Ting Lee; Naoki Tani; Bibian Diway; Pei Sing Lai; Eyen Khoo
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  Evaluation of the DNA barcodes in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) from mainland Asia.

Authors:  Songzhi Xu; Dezhu Li; Jianwu Li; Xiaoguo Xiang; Weitao Jin; Weichang Huang; Xiaohua Jin; Luqi Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Learning to classify species with barcodes.

Authors:  Paola Bertolazzi; Giovanni Felici; Emanuel Weitschek
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species.

Authors:  Shilin Chen; Hui Yao; Jianping Han; Chang Liu; Jingyuan Song; Linchun Shi; Yingjie Zhu; Xinye Ma; Ting Gao; Xiaohui Pang; Kun Luo; Ying Li; Xiwen Li; Xiaocheng Jia; Yulin Lin; Christine Leon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantification of adulteration in traded ayurvedic raw drugs employing machine learning approaches with DNA barcode database.

Authors:  Suma Arun Dev; Remya Unnikrishnan; R Jayaraj; P Sujanapal; V Anitha
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  The efficacy of machine learning algorithm for raw drug authentication in Coscinium fenestratum (Gaertn.) Colebr. employing a DNA barcode database.

Authors:  Remya Unnikrishnan; M Sumod; R Jayaraj; P Sujanapal; Suma Arun Dev
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2021-03-15

3.  Multilocus marker-based delimitation of Salicornia persica and its population discrimination assisted by supervised machine learning approach.

Authors:  Rahul Jamdade; Khawla Al-Shaer; Mariam Al-Sallani; Eman Al-Harthi; Tamer Mahmoud; Sanjay Gairola; Hatem A Shabana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Comparative Analyses of Five Complete Chloroplast Genomes from the Genus Pterocarpus (Fabacaeae).

Authors:  Zhou Hong; Zhiqiang Wu; Kunkun Zhao; Zengjiang Yang; Ningnan Zhang; Junyu Guo; Luke R Tembrock; Daping Xu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.