Literature DB >> 25601670

Mechanical failure of metal-polyethylene sandwich liner in metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Yasushi Oshima1, Joseph F Fetto.   

Abstract

Metal-on-metal had been proposed as an optimal articulation in THRs, however, many monoblock prostheses have been recalled in the USA because of significant high rates of early failure. Metal-on-metal prostheses had been implanted in our institution, and this is a case history of a single patient, in whom metal-on-metal THRs with different femoral sizes of heads were implanted. A 57-year-old female patient underwent bilateral total hip replacements with metal-on-metal prostheses using metal-polyethylene "sandwich" liners 9 years ago on the right side and 7 years ago on the left side respectively. The only difference in both sides was the femoral head diameter of 28 mm in right and 34 mm in left. Seven years after the left surgery, the acetabular liner was dissociated, however, metallosis was not detected. Although the larger femoral head was thought to increase hip joint stability, it dictated a reduction in polyethylene thickness in this prosthesis design, and it was 4 mm in the left hip. Recently, metal-on-metal articulations are thought not to be optimal for hip joint bearing surface, however, this clinical failure was due to the polyethylene thickness and quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25601670     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5383-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  18 in total

Review 1.  Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far.

Authors:  F S Haddad; R R Thakrar; A J Hart; J A Skinner; A V F Nargol; J F Nolan; H S Gill; D W Murray; A W Blom; C P Case
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-05

2.  The withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Authors:  Kevin T Hug; Tyler S Watters; Thomas P Vail; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The benefits of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.

Authors:  M E Müller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The rationale for metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John M Cuckler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Marius von Knoch; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Dissociation of the metal inlay from the polyethylene liner in an uncemented threaded cup.

Authors:  Ingrid Milosev; Rihard Trebse; Simon Kovac; Andrej Cör; Pat Campbell
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head.

Authors:  Einar Amlie; Øystein Høvik; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-05-27

8.  5-year experience of highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm; Jonas Thanner; Peter Herberts
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Dislocation after total hip replacement in relation to metal-on-metal bearing surfaces.

Authors:  M T Clarke; P T H Lee; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-07

10.  In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components.

Authors:  J M Kabo; J S Gebhard; G Loren; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.