Literature DB >> 25598987

Risk of local failure after ultrasound guided irreversible electroporation of malignant liver tumors.

Robert M Eisele, Sascha S Chopra, Matthias Glanemann, Bernhard Gebauer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is considered superior to thermoablations for tumors in the vicinity of larger vessels and the liver hilum. We report on an initial clinical experience of IRE.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Indications included focal liver lesions <3 cm, irresectability due to contraindications and expected complications and/or irradicality following radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Ultrasound was chosen for guidance and needle placement.
RESULTS: IRE was intended to perform in 14 patients with 1 procedure aborted due to technical failure. Among the 13 successfully treated were 7 percutaneous, 4 laparoscopic, and 2 open surgical procedures. The average age was 63 ± 10 years. Twelve solitary nodules and one bifocal disease were treated with an average size of 1.5 cm ± 0.5 cm. Median follow-up was 6 months. Three incomplete ablations account for 21% (3/14), 2 of them occurring in 2 metastases larger than 2 cm percutaneously treated with 5 needles instead of 4 used for smaller tumor sizes.
CONCLUSION: IRE was introduced without difficulties into clinical practice. As a main obstacle emerged in visualization of the needles, computed tomography may offer advantages in the guidance of percutaneous IRE of liver metastases larger than 2 cm. Local failure occurred in 21%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal liver metastases; hepatocellular carcinoma; irreversible electroporation; minimal invasive liver surgery; ultrasound guided ablation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25598987      PMCID: PMC4274353          DOI: 10.1556/IMAS.6.2014.4.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci        ISSN: 2061-1617


  17 in total

1.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Local recurrence after hepatic radiofrequency coagulation: multivariate meta-analysis and review of contributing factors.

Authors:  Stefaan Mulier; Yicheng Ni; Jacques Jamart; Theo Ruers; Guy Marchal; Luc Michel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Irreversible electroporation ablation: is all the damage nonthermal?

Authors:  Mohammad Faroja; Muneeb Ahmed; Liat Appelbaum; Eliel Ben-David; Marwan Moussa; Jacob Sosna; Isaac Nissenbaum; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Irreversible electroporation of a liver metastasis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mannelli; Siddharth A Padia; Raymond S Yeung; Douglas E Green
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 5.828

5.  Local control of perivascular malignant liver lesions using percutaneous irreversible electroporation: initial experiences.

Authors:  Achim Eller; Axel Schmid; Joachim Schmidt; Matthias May; Michael Brand; Marc Saake; Michael Uder; Michael Lell
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Ablation of perivascular hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Ami M Karkar; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Ronald P Dematteo; George I Getrajdman; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Irreversible electroporation: a new challenge in "out of operating theater" anesthesia.

Authors:  Christine Ball; Kenneth R Thomson; Helen Kavnoudias
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Irreversible electroporation: a novel image-guided cancer therapy.

Authors:  Edward W Lee; Susan Thai; Stephen T Kee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  Pain analysis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation-initial observations.

Authors:  Govindarajan Narayanan; Tatiana Froud; Kaming Lo; Katuska J Barbery; Evelyn Perez-Rojas; Jose Yrizarry
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Percutaneous ablation of peribiliary tumors with irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  Mikhail T Silk; Thomas Wimmer; Kyungmouk S Lee; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Karren T Brown; Peter T Kingham; Yuman Fong; Jeremy C Durack; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  4 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of irreversible electroporation for malignant liver tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Gupta; Muniraju Maralakunte; Sathya Sagar; Praveen Kumar-M; Harish Bhujade; Sreedhara B Chaluvashetty; Naveen Kalra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Recurrence patterns following irreversible electroporation for hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Russell C Langan; Debra A Goldman; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter J Allen; Vinod P Balachandran; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  [Clinical application of laparoscopy-assisted and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma].

Authors:  Shude Chen; Hongguang Wang; Wenzhi Zhang; Jiye Chen; Peng Lu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-08-30

4.  Early Detection of Local Tumor Progression after Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Gd-EOB-DTPA-Based MR Imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Wolf Bäumler; Philipp Wiggermann; Lukas Lürken; Marco Dollinger; Christian Stroszczynski; Lukas P Beyer; Andreas Schicho
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.