OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that influence local recurrence after radiofrequency coagulation of liver tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Local recurrence rate varies widely between 2% and 60%. Apart from tumor size as an important risk factor for local recurrence, little is known about the impact of other factors. METHODS: An exhaustive literature search was carried out for the period from January 1, 1990 to January 1, 2004. Only series with a minimal follow-up of 6 months and/or mean follow-up of 12 months were included. Univariate and multivariate meta-analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Ninety-five independent series were included, allowing the analysis of the local recurrence rate of 5224 treated liver tumors. In a univariate analysis, tumor-dependent factors with significantly less local recurrences were: smaller size, neuroendocrine metastases, nonsubcapsular location, and location away from large vessels. Physician-dependent favorable factors were: surgical (open or laparoscopic) approach, vascular occlusion, general anesthesia, a 1-cm intentional margin, and a greater physician experience. In a multivariate analysis, significantly less local recurrences were observed for small size (P < 0.001) and a surgical (versus percutaneous) approach (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency coagulation by laparoscopy or laparotomy results in superior local control, independent of tumor size. The percutaneous route should mainly be reserved for patients who cannot tolerate a laparoscopy or laparotomy. The short-term benefits of less invasiveness for the percutaneous route do not outweigh the longer-term higher risk of local recurrence.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that influence local recurrence after radiofrequency coagulation of liver tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Local recurrence rate varies widely between 2% and 60%. Apart from tumor size as an important risk factor for local recurrence, little is known about the impact of other factors. METHODS: An exhaustive literature search was carried out for the period from January 1, 1990 to January 1, 2004. Only series with a minimal follow-up of 6 months and/or mean follow-up of 12 months were included. Univariate and multivariate meta-analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Ninety-five independent series were included, allowing the analysis of the local recurrence rate of 5224 treated liver tumors. In a univariate analysis, tumor-dependent factors with significantly less local recurrences were: smaller size, neuroendocrine metastases, nonsubcapsular location, and location away from large vessels. Physician-dependent favorable factors were: surgical (open or laparoscopic) approach, vascular occlusion, general anesthesia, a 1-cm intentional margin, and a greater physician experience. In a multivariate analysis, significantly less local recurrences were observed for small size (P < 0.001) and a surgical (versus percutaneous) approach (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency coagulation by laparoscopy or laparotomy results in superior local control, independent of tumor size. The percutaneous route should mainly be reserved for patients who cannot tolerate a laparoscopy or laparotomy. The short-term benefits of less invasiveness for the percutaneous route do not outweigh the longer-term higher risk of local recurrence.
Authors: Steven C Rose; Tarek I Hassanein; Michael Bouvet; Marquis E Hart; Ajai Khanna; M Wayne Saville Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: S Ambiru; M Miyazaki; T Isono; H Ito; K Nakagawa; H Shimizu; K Kusashio; S Furuya; N Nakajima Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: S C Rose; T I Hassanein; D W Easter; R A Gamagami; M Bouvet; D H Pretorius; T R Nelson; T B Kinney; G M James Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Courtney L Scaife; Steven A Curley; Francesco Izzo; Paolo Marra; Paolo Delrio; Bruno Daniele; Franco Cremona; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Judy L Chase; Richard D Lozano; Yehuda Z Patt; Bruno D Fornage; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Misty L Woodall; Karen B Gonzalez; Lee M Ellis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Karen T Brown; Stephen B Solomon; Anne M Covey; William Alago; Lynn A Brody; Raymond H Thornton; Michael D'Angelica; Yuman Fong; Nancy E Kemeny Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: T Ruers; C Punt; F Van Coevorden; J P E N Pierie; I Borel-Rinkes; J A Ledermann; G Poston; W Bechstein; M A Lentz; M Mauer; E Van Cutsem; M P Lutz; B Nordlinger Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Gianpiero Gravante; John Overton; Roberto Sorge; Neil Bhardwaj; Matthew S Metcalfe; David M Lloyd; Ashley R Dennison Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: A A J M Van Tilborg; M R Meijerink; C Sietses; J H T M Van Waesberghe; M O Mackintosh; S Meijer; C Van Kuijk; P Van Den Tol Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 3.039