Literature DB >> 25596824

Genome engineering in cattle: recent technological advancements.

Zhongde Wang1.   

Abstract

Great strides in technological advancements have been made in the past decade in cattle genome engineering. First, the success of cloning cattle by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) or chromatin transfer (CT) is a significant advancement that has made obsolete the need for using embryonic stem (ES) cells to conduct cell-mediated genome engineering, whereby site-specific genetic modifications can be conducted in bovine somatic cells via DNA homologous recombination (HR) and whereby genetically engineered cattle can subsequently be produced by animal cloning from the genetically modified cells. With this approach, a chosen bovine genomic locus can be precisely modified in somatic cells, such as to knock out (KO) or knock in (KI) a gene via HR, a gene-targeting strategy that had almost exclusively been used in mouse ES cells. Furthermore, by the creative application of embryonic cloning to rejuvenate somatic cells, cattle genome can be sequentially modified in the same line of somatic cells and complex genetic modifications have been achieved in cattle. Very recently, the development of designer nucleases-such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9)-has enabled highly efficient and more facile genome engineering in cattle. Most notably, by employing such designer nucleases, genomes can be engineered at single-nucleotide precision; this process is now often referred to as genome or gene editing. The above achievements are a drastic departure from the traditional methods of creating genetically modified cattle, where foreign DNAs are randomly integrated into the animal genome, most often along with the integrations of bacterial or viral DNAs. Here, I review the most recent technological developments in cattle genome engineering by highlighting some of the major achievements in creating genetically engineered cattle for agricultural and biomedical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25596824     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-014-9452-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  60 in total

1.  Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in double-muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese cattle.

Authors:  R Kambadur; M Sharma; T P Smith; J J Bass
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Positive genetic selection for gene disruption in mammalian cells by homologous recombination.

Authors:  J M Sedivy; P A Sharp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  TALEN-mediated genome editing: prospects and perspectives.

Authors:  David A Wright; Ting Li; Bing Yang; Martin H Spalding
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer by perivitelline microinjection of mouse, rat, and cow embryos.

Authors:  H M Kubisch; M A Larson; P A Eichen; J M Wilson; R M Roberts
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Liposome-mediated DNA uptake by sperm cells.

Authors:  D Bachiller; K Schellander; J Peli; U Rüther
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 7.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Gaj; Charles A Gersbach; Carlos F Barbas
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

8.  Generation of transgenic dairy cattle using 'in vitro' embryo production.

Authors:  P Krimpenfort; A Rademakers; W Eyestone; A van der Schans; S van den Broek; P Kooiman; E Kootwijk; G Platenburg; F Pieper; R Strijker
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1991-09

9.  Allergy to bovine beta-lactoglobulin: specificity of human IgE using cyanogen bromide-derived peptides.

Authors:  I Sélo; L Négroni; C Créminon; M Yvon; G Peltre; J M Wal
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.749

10.  A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity.

Authors:  Claudio Mussolino; Robert Morbitzer; Fabienne Lütge; Nadine Dannemann; Thomas Lahaye; Toni Cathomen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina.

Authors:  Agustina I Whelan; Martin A Lema
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 2.  What rheumatologists need to know about CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Gary J Gibson; Maozhou Yang
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  A history of genome editing in mammals.

Authors:  Almudena Fernández; Santiago Josa; Lluis Montoliu
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  One-step Multiplex Transgenesis via Sleeping Beauty Transposition in Cattle.

Authors:  Wiebke Garrels; Thirumala R Talluri; Ronja Apfelbaum; Yanet P Carratalá; Pablo Bosch; Kerstin Pötzsch; Esther Grueso; Zoltán Ivics; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Structural and Dynamic Characterization of the C313Y Mutation in Myostatin Dimeric Protein, Responsible for the "Double Muscle" Phenotype in Piedmontese Cattle.

Authors:  Silvia Bongiorni; Alessio Valentini; Giovanni Chillemi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Advances in genome editing for improved animal breeding: A review.

Authors:  Shakil Ahmad Bhat; Abrar Ahad Malik; Syed Mudasir Ahmad; Riaz Ahmad Shah; Nazir Ahmad Ganai; Syed Shanaz Shafi; Nadeem Shabir
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-11-21

Review 7.  Progress and Prospects of CRISPR/Cas Systems in Insects and Other Arthropods.

Authors:  Dan Sun; Zhaojiang Guo; Yong Liu; Youjun Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Edition of TFAM gene by CRISPR/Cas9 technology in bovine model.

Authors:  Vanessa Cristina de Oliveira; Gabriel Sassarão Alves Moreira; Fabiana Fernandes Bressan; Clésio Gomes Mariano Junior; Kelly Cristine Santos Roballo; Marine Charpentier; Jean-Paul Concordet; Flávio Vieira Meirelles; Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Moving toward a higher efficiency of microcell-mediated chromosome transfer.

Authors:  Mikhail Liskovykh; Nicholas Co Lee; Vladimir Larionov; Natalay Kouprina
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 6.698

10.  Relationship between DNA mismatch repair and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in the bovine β-casein gene locus.

Authors:  Seung-Yeon Kim; Ga-Yeon Kim; Hyeong-Ju You; Man-Jong Kang
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-06-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.