Literature DB >> 25595419

Successful trans-apical aortic valve implantation for a high risk patient with aortic stenosis using a new second-generation TAVI device - J-Valve system.

Jiahan Cheng1,2, Miao Chen3, Da Zhu4, Ji Zhang5, Jia Hu6, Yingqiang Guo7.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved as a routine procedure to treat selected high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. The new J-Valve prosthesis is designed for antegrade transapical implantation, it is characterized by a porcine aortic prosthesis attaching to a self-expandable Nitinol stent. The key feature of the device are three U-shape anatomically oriented devices - "graspers" which could facilitate intuitive 'self-positioning' valve implantation. Hereby, we report a successful case of trans-apical TAVI in an elderly high-risk patient with severe aortic stenosis using J-Valve system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595419      PMCID: PMC4299398          DOI: 10.1186/s13019-015-0207-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1749-8090            Impact factor:   1.637


Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been recognized as a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with inoperable or high-risk symptomatic aortic stenosis [1]. The J-Valve™ system is a brand new second generation TAVI device featured by a porcine aortic prosthesis attaching to a self-expandable Nitinol stent and three U-shape anatomically oriented devices “graspers” encircling around the stent. This unique design could facilitate intuitive “self-positioning” valve implantation and provide both axial as well as radial fixation by embracing the native valve leaflets. We performed the first-in-man case of successfully TAVI operation for a high-risk patient with severe aortic stenosis using the J-Valve™ system through trans-apical approach.

Case report

An 80 years old female was referred to our hospital due to severe aortic stenosis and recurrent episodes of decompensated left heart failure. She presented with a history of stroke 7 month ago with no obvious sequelae. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) confirmed a severe aortic stenosis with a mean pressure gradient of 58 mmHg and aortic valve opening area 0.6 cm2. Extra-cardiac arterial disease involving carotid, intra-cranial and lower limb arteries was confirmed through vascular ultrasound and MRI angiogram. Preoperative CT angiogram revealed a heavily calcified aortic valve with aortic annulus diameter 25 mm (derived from annulus perimeter). After interdisciplinary assessment, the patient was scheduled for trans-apical aortic valve implantation because of a significantly increased risk for conventional surgery. (Logistic EuroSCORE = 28%). The informed consent was obtained after discussing all available treatment options. Ethic committee of our hospital also approved this procedure. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia in a fully equipped hybrid operating room. Prior to skin incision, a femoral ‘safety-net’ (percutaneous wires in the femoral vessels) was placed and a readily primed CPB machine was available in the room for immediate CPB if required. Temporary pacemaker was placed in the right ventricle through right internal jugular vein and then the standard apical access was obtained. A cranial left-anterior-oblique angulation was chosen by adjusting the angulation of the fluoroscopic system which could provide good visualization of each commissure of the aortic valve. The apical puncture was done with a super-stiff guide-wire placed in position. The standard apical aortic valvuloplasty was performed using a straight 24-mm balloon under rapid ventricular pacing (RVP). In parallel, a 27-mm J-Valve™ was crimped into the Ausper-AS delivery system (JC Medical Inc., Florida, California, USA) (Figure 1). The delivery system was bluntly inserted into the left ventricle and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance into a supra-annular position (Figure 2). In the next step, the three ‘U-shape graspers’ were totally released and care was taken to bring each grasper into the corresponding aortic sinus by gently pulling back the delivery system, thereby embracing the native leaflets (Figure 2). The correct position was identified on both fluoroscopy as well as trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Then the valve was pulled back gently into the annular plan with the guidance of the graspers and deployed without rapid ventricular beating (Figure 3). After retrieval of the delivery system, aortic root angiography revealed only trivial para-valvular leakage with patent coronaries and good valve stent position (Figure 3). TEE also confirmed a good valve position with only trivial grade para-valvular leakage (Figure 4).
Figure 1

The J-Valve™ system. J-Valve™ is composed of a porcine aortic valve attaching to a self-expandable nitinol stent with three U-shape graspers encircling the valve stent.

Figure 2

The implantation process of J-Valve™ system (Part I). Panel A-B: the delivery sheath was sent into the supra-annular plan through transapical approach. Panel C-D: Three graspers (small black arrow) were then totally released and pushed back gently into the aortic sinuses, angiogram was performed to ensure the correct position of the graspers.

Figure 3

The implantation process of J-Valve™ system (Part II). Panel A-B: The valve was retrieved into the annular plan with the help of the locking device. Panel C-D: The valve was then deployed without rapid ventricular pacing, further angiogram confirmed good position of the valve while without obvious paravalvular leakage.

Figure 4

Pre and post-operative TEE image of this patient. Panel A: Preoperative TEE reveled a calcified aortic valve with severe stenosis. Panel B: Both short and long axis view of TEE confirmed a good valve position with only trivial grade para-valvular leakage.

The J-Valve™ system. J-Valve™ is composed of a porcine aortic valve attaching to a self-expandable nitinol stent with three U-shape graspers encircling the valve stent. The implantation process of J-Valve™ system (Part I). Panel A-B: the delivery sheath was sent into the supra-annular plan through transapical approach. Panel C-D: Three graspers (small black arrow) were then totally released and pushed back gently into the aortic sinuses, angiogram was performed to ensure the correct position of the graspers. The implantation process of J-Valve™ system (Part II). Panel A-B: The valve was retrieved into the annular plan with the help of the locking device. Panel C-D: The valve was then deployed without rapid ventricular pacing, further angiogram confirmed good position of the valve while without obvious paravalvular leakage. Pre and post-operative TEE image of this patient. Panel A: Preoperative TEE reveled a calcified aortic valve with severe stenosis. Panel B: Both short and long axis view of TEE confirmed a good valve position with only trivial grade para-valvular leakage. After wound closure, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. Further postoperative course was uneventful. At discharge, TTE revealed an excellent valve function without any relevant incompetence and obvious paravalvular leakage. The maximum and mean transvalvular gradients were 18 and 11 mmHg measured by Doppler ultrasound. During the 3-month follow-up, this patient remained in good health, TTE confirmed an optimal valve position with no paravalvular leakage.

Discussion

TAVI has evolved as a routine procedure for high risk patient with severe aortic stenosis. Medtronic CoreValve™ and Edward SAPIEN™ are two classic TAVI systems which have been widely used with accepted results [2,3]. However, these first-generation systems still have specific drawbacks such as highly technique requirements for precise valve positioning, relatively frequent requirement for pace-maker implantation as well as high risk for more than mild degree para-valvular leakage [2,3]. Next-generation transcatheter valves should overcome the known limitations of the currently available TAVI. In this case, we used the brand new J-Valve™ TAVI system. Sharing the similarity with other second-generation TAVI devices with anatomically oriented devices such as Jena-Valve™ and Medtronic Engager Valve™ [4,5], this system is characterized by a unique design U-shape graspers which could be totally released before the valve implantation facilitating intuitive ‘self-positioning’ valve implantation. This unique design could greatly simplify the implantation process and lead to more consistent results, because the operator does not need to actively judge for optimal valve position. Meanwhile, through embracing the native valve leaflets through three U shape graspers, J-Valve™ system has the advantage of achieving better anchoring, less risk for coronary obstruction from native cusp calcification, as well as less risk of conduction block (extra-axial fixation and subsequent less radial expansion forces). Also different from other second-generation TAVI devices, U-Shape graspers of J-Valve™ system could increase the interface between aortic valve leaflets and valve prosthesis which would provide more anchorage force (axial fixation) after valve deployment. In addition, the unique two stage releasing design of this system (graspers totally release first and followed by the valve release) could also largely facilitate accurate adjusting the position of the graspers before valve deployment. Furthermore, compared with single arm feeler device of Jena-valve™, this U-shape grasper could also minimize the risk of native valve perforation.

Conclusion

The new J-Valve™ prosthesis is a brand new second generation TAVI device. It is featured by three U-shape anatomical orientated devices - “graspers” which could largely facilitate intuitive ‘self-positioning’ valve implantation. As shown in this case, this system provide a potential valuable treatment option for high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Consent

Note: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of complications in aortic valve replacement: comparison of Medtronic-Corevalve, Edwards-Sapien and surgical aortic valve replacement in 8,536 patients.

Authors:  Hasan Jilaihawi; Tarun Chakravarty; Robert E Weiss; Gregory P Fontana; James Forrester; Raj R Makkar
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Intermediate follow-up results from the multicenter engager European pivotal trial.

Authors:  David Holzhey; Axel Linke; Hendrik Treede; Stephan Baldus; Sabine Bleiziffer; Anke Wagner; Jochen Börgermann; Werner Scholtz; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Trans-apical aortic valve implantation: univariate and multivariate analyses of the early results from the SOURCE registry.

Authors:  Olaf Wendler; Thomas Walther; Patrick Nataf; Paolo Rubino; Holger Schroefel; Matthias Thielmann; Hendrik Treede; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve System.

Authors:  Robert M A van der Boon; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Dominic A Theuns; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Sjoerd T Nauta; Patrick W Serruys; Luc Jordaens; Ron T van Domburg; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the JenaValve™ system: acute and 30-day results of the multicentre CE-mark study.

Authors:  Hendrik Treede; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Stephan Baldus; Ardawan Rastan; Stephan Ensminger; Martin Arnold; Joerg Kempfert; Hans-Reiner Figulla
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 4.191

  5 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing.

Authors:  Oren M Rotman; Matteo Bianchi; Ram P Ghosh; Brandon Kovarovic; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Structural Valve Deterioration after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using J-Valve: A Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Fei Li; Xu Wang; Yuetang Wang; Fei Xu; Xin Wang; Xuan Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Delayed right coronary ostial obstruction after J-valve deployment in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A case report.

Authors:  Zhao Xu; Hong Yu; Peng Liang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.