Literature DB >> 22508111

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the JenaValve™ system: acute and 30-day results of the multicentre CE-mark study.

Hendrik Treede1, Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr, Stephan Baldus, Ardawan Rastan, Stephan Ensminger, Martin Arnold, Joerg Kempfert, Hans-Reiner Figulla.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has shown promising results in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high risk for conventional heart surgery. The safety and efficacy of transapical aortic valve implantation using the JenaValve™, a second-generation TAVI device, were evaluated. The system consists of a tested porcine root valve mounted on a nitinol stent with feeler-guided positioning and clip fixation on the diseased leaflets.
METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, single-arm study, conducted at seven German sites, enrolled 73 patients (mean age 83.1 ± 3.9), European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) (28.4 ± 6.5%) of whom 67 patients underwent elective TAVI. Three sizes were used for annular diameters up to 23 mm (n = 21), 25 mm (n = 31) and 27 mm (n = 15). Clinical and echocardiographic evaluations were performed at baseline, post-procedure, discharge and 30 days, and also at 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were procedural success, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and echocardiographic performance.
RESULTS: TAVI with the JenaValve™ device was successful in 60 patients (procedural success rate 89.6%). The overall mortality at 30 days was 7.6%. Conversion to surgery was necessary in four patients (6%), two patients underwent valve-in-valve implantations (3%), one patient was withdrawn per protocol after conversion to TAVI using a balloon-expandable valve (1.5%) since the patient did not receive the study device. Perioperative stroke occurred in two cases (3%). Pacemaker implantation for new onset conduction disorders was necessary in six patients (9.1%). No ostial coronary obstructions were seen. Post-procedure TAVI resulted in favourable reduction of mean transvalvular gradients (40.6 ± 15.9 vs. 10.0 ± 7.2 mmHg, P < 0.0001) and increase in valve opening area (0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.7 ± 0.6 cm², P < 0.0001). The majority of successfully treated patients revealed no or minimal paravalvular aortic regurgitation (86.4%); none of the patients had severe post-procedural regurgitation (>2+).
CONCLUSIONS: Transapical JenaValve™ implantation was safe and effective in the treatment of severe AS in elderly patients at high risk for surgery. Active clip fixation on the native leaflets and anatomically correct feeler-guided positioning led to good functionality and prevented ostial coronary impairment. Implantation without the need for rapid pacing prevented haemodynamic compromise during valve implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508111     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  21 in total

1.  Transapical aortic valve implantation with anatomically oriented prostheses.

Authors:  Simon Sündermann; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

Review 2.  Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with native aortic valve regurgitation.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Siri Kadire; Mark R Heckle; Jiajing Wang; Uzoma N Ibebuogu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

3.  Rescue valve-in-valve implantations in second generation transapical transcatheter aortic valve prostheses.

Authors:  Arnaud Van Linden; Johannes Blumenstein; Thomas Walther; Helge Möllmann; Won Keun Kim; Christian Hamm; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.

Authors:  Manuel Martinez-Selles; Peter Bramlage; Martin Thoenes; Gerhard Schymik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  New devices for TAVI: technologies and initial clinical experiences.

Authors:  Maurizio Taramasso; Alberto Pozzoli; Azeem Latib; Giovanni La Canna; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Maisano; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  On the Mechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Hoda Hatoum; Arash Kheradvar; Ramin Zareian; S Hamed Alavi; Wei Sun; Caitlin Martin; Thuy Pham; Qian Wang; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after TAVR - Predictors and Impact on Outcomes.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Jan-Malte Sinning; Christoph Hammerstingl; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05

Review 8.  Clinical implications of conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Robert M A van der Boon; Patrick Houthuizen; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Frits Prinzen; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Mechanisms of Heart Block after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - Cardiac Anatomy, Clinical Predictors and Mechanical Factors that Contribute to Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.

Authors:  Mark Young Lee; Srinath Chilakamarri Yeshwant; Sreedivya Chava; Daniel Lawrence Lustgarten
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-08

10.  TAVR and SAVR: Current Treatment of Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Patrick P Hu
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.