Literature DB >> 22415849

Meta-analysis of complications in aortic valve replacement: comparison of Medtronic-Corevalve, Edwards-Sapien and surgical aortic valve replacement in 8,536 patients.

Hasan Jilaihawi1, Tarun Chakravarty, Robert E Weiss, Gregory P Fontana, James Forrester, Raj R Makkar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to establish the complication rates following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the context of high risk and octogenarian surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the contemporary literature, and to critically analyze population characteristics and outcomes.
METHODS: TAVR studies were selected from nonoverlapping series and SAVR studies for comparison if they met similar entry criteria. Bayesian meta-analytic methods were employed.
RESULTS: For the 5024 TAVR and 3512 SAVR patients included in the study, TAVR subjects had greater baseline renal impairment (P < 0.001), a higher incidence of prior myocardial infarction (P = 0.032) and respiratory disease (P = 0.005) and a higher logistic EuroSCORE (P = 0.039). There were no significant differences observed in complications studied in SAVR and TAVR: 30 day mortality (9% vs 8.5%, P = 0.31), 1 year mortality (18.4% vs 22.8%, P = 0.65), 30 day stroke (2.4% vs 2.6%, P = 0.72), new permanent pacemaker (5.9% vs 12.1%, P = 0.055) and dialysis inception (2.4% vs 4.1%, P = 0.70). We also compared demographics and outcomes between the two types of transcatheter valves. Apart from some variation in functional status, there were no significant differences at baseline with different TAVR designs. The only difference in complications was the need for pacemaker insertion, higher with the Medtronic-Corevalve than with the Edwards-Sapien design (24.5% vs 5.9% P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Complications for elderly and high risk aortic stenosis patients being treated by TAVR appear comparable to those selected for SAVR in the real-world.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415849     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  21 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Sharif A Halim; Todd L Kiefer; G Chad Hughes; Lynne M Hurwitz; J Kevin Harrison
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Management strategies for acute coronary occlusion associated with CoreValve transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Sreedivya Chava; Edward Terrien; Joseph Schmoker; Marc Tischler; Harold L Dauerman
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Chia-Shing Yang; Erik S Marshall; Zaher Fanari; Michael J Kostal; Joseph T West; Paul Kolm; William S Weintraub; Andrew J Doorey
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Aerosol-generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Tran; K Cimon; M Severn; Cl Pessoa-Silva; J Conly
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2013-02-01

Review 5.  Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.

Authors:  Manuel Martinez-Selles; Peter Bramlage; Martin Thoenes; Gerhard Schymik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Krys Milburn; Vinayak Bapat; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Predictors of right ventricular pacing and pacemaker dependence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.

Authors:  Esseim Sharma; Antony F Chu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  James F Meschia; Cheryl Bushnell; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Lynne T Braun; Dawn M Bravata; Seemant Chaturvedi; Mark A Creager; Robert H Eckel; Mitchell S V Elkind; Myriam Fornage; Larry B Goldstein; Steven M Greenberg; Susanna E Horvath; Costantino Iadecola; Edward C Jauch; Wesley S Moore; John A Wilson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Propensity-Matched Comparison.

Authors:  J Matthew Brennan; Laine Thomas; David J Cohen; David Shahian; Alice Wang; Michael J Mack; David R Holmes; Fred H Edwards; Naftali Z Frankel; Suzanne J Baron; John Carroll; Vinod Thourani; E Murat Tuzcu; Suzanne V Arnold; Roberta Cohn; Todd Maser; Brenda Schawe; Susan Strong; Allen Stickfort; Elizabeth Patrick-Lake; Felicia L Graham; Dadi Dai; Fan Li; Roland A Matsouaka; Sean O'Brien; Fan Li; Michael J Pencina; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis using Medtronic new generation self-expanding CoreValve Evolut R.

Authors:  Hidehiro Kaneko; Frank Hoelschermann; Martin Seifert; Grit Tambor; Maki Okamoto; Viviane Moeller; Michael Neuss; Christian Butter
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.