Literature DB >> 25592468

Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks.

Florence E Turrentine1, Chaderick E Denlinger1, Virginia B Simpson1, Robert A Garwood1, Stephanie Guerlain2, Abhinav Agrawal2, Charles M Friel1, Damien J LaPar1, George J Stukenborg3, R Scott Jones4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak, a potentially deadly postoperative occurrence, particularly interests surgeons performing gastrointestinal procedures. We investigated incidence, cost, and impact on survival of anastomotic leak in gastrointestinal surgical procedures at an academic center. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a chart review of American College of Surgeons NSQIP operative procedures with gastrointestinal anastomosis from January 1, 2003 through April 30, 2006. Each case with an American College of Surgeons NSQIP 30-day postoperative complication was systematically reviewed for evidence of anastomotic leak for 12 months after the operative date. We tracked patients for up to 10 years to determine survival. Morbidity, mortality, and cost for patients with gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks were compared with patients with anastomoses that remained intact.
RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses revealed significant differences between patients who had anastomotic leaks develop and those who did not: morbidity (98.0% vs. 28.4%; p < 0.0001), length of stay (13 vs. 5 days; p ≤ 0.0001), 30-day mortality (8.4% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.0001), long-term mortality (36.4% vs. 20.0%; p ≤ 0.0001), and hospital costs (chi-square [2] = 359.8; p < 0.0001). Multivariable regression demonstrated that anastomotic leak was associated with congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR] = 31.5; 95% CI, 2.6-381.4; p = 0.007), peripheral vascular disease (OR = 4.6; 95% CI, 1.0-20.5; p = 0.048), alcohol abuse (OR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.6-8.3; p = 0.002), steroid use (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-5.0; p = 0.027), abnormal sodium (OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7; p = 0.002), weight loss (OR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.06-0.7; p = 0.011), and location of anastomosis: rectum (OR = 14.0; 95% CI, 2.6-75.5; p = 0.002), esophagus (OR = 13.0; 95% CI, 3.6-46.2; p < 0.0001), pancreas (OR = 12.4; 95% CI, 3.3-46.2; p < 0.0001), small intestine (OR = 6.9; 95% CI, 1.8-26.4; p = 0.005), and colon (OR = 5.2; 95% CI, 1.5-17.7; p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant morbidity, mortality, and cost accompany gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. Patients who experience an anastomotic leak have lower rates of survival at 30 days and long term.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25592468     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  40 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Ewen A Griffiths; Maurizio Nestori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 2.  The Biology of Anastomotic Healing-the Unknown Overwhelms the Known.

Authors:  Adam Lam; Brian Fleischer; John Alverdy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Postoperative Peritonitis After Digestive Tract Surgery: Surgical Management and Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality, a Cohort of 191 Patients.

Authors:  Thierry Bensignor; Jérémie H Lefevre; Ben Creavin; Najim Chafai; Thomas Lescot; Thévy Hor; Clotilde Debove; François Paye; Pierre Balladur; Emmanuel Tiret; Yann Parc
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

6.  A Population-Based Cohort Study of Emergency Appendectomy Performed in England and New York State.

Authors:  Waleed Al-Khyatt; Jemma Mytton; Benjamin H L Tan; Christopher T Aquina; Felicity Evison; Fergal J Fleming; Sandro Pasquali; Ewen A Griffiths; Ravinder S Vohra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.

Authors:  David Wei; Stephen Johnston; Laura Goldstein; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Prevention of Perioperative Anastomotic Healing Complications: Anastomotic Stricture and Anastomotic Leak.

Authors:  Kristina L Guyton; Neil H Hyman; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2016-06-29

9.  Morbidity and Mortality After Gastrectomy: Identification of Modifiable Risk Factors.

Authors:  Allison N Martin; Deepanjana Das; Florence E Turrentine; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  MELD-Na score associated with postoperative complications in hernia repair in non-cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  K A Schlosser; A M Kao; Y Zhang; T Prasad; K R Kasten; B R Davis; B T Heniford; P D Colavita
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.