Adam Lam1, Brian Fleischer1, John Alverdy2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S Maryland MC 6090, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S Maryland MC 6090, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. jalverdy@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic complications are among the most devastating consequences of gastrointestinal surgery. Despite its high morbidity, the factors responsible for anastomotic regeneration following surgical construction remain poorly understood. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the typical and atypical factors that have been implicated in anastomotic healing. METHODS: A review and analysis of select literature on anastomotic healing was performed. RESULTS: The healing of an anastomotic wound mirrors the phases of cutaneous wound healing- inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. The evidence supporting much of the traditional dogma for optimal anastomotic healing (ischemia, tension, nutrition) is sparse. More recent research has implicated atypical factors that influence anastomotic healing, including the microbiome, the mesentery, and geometry. As technology evolves, endoscopic approaches may improve anastomotic healing and in some cases may eliminate the anastomosis altogether. DISCUSSION: Much remains unknown regarding the mechanisms of anastomotic healing, and research should focus on elucidating the dynamics of healing at a molecular level. Doing so may help facilitate the transition from traditional surgical dogma to evidence-based medicine in the operating room.
BACKGROUND:Anastomotic complications are among the most devastating consequences of gastrointestinal surgery. Despite its high morbidity, the factors responsible for anastomotic regeneration following surgical construction remain poorly understood. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the typical and atypical factors that have been implicated in anastomotic healing. METHODS: A review and analysis of select literature on anastomotic healing was performed. RESULTS: The healing of an anastomotic wound mirrors the phases of cutaneous wound healing- inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. The evidence supporting much of the traditional dogma for optimal anastomotic healing (ischemia, tension, nutrition) is sparse. More recent research has implicated atypical factors that influence anastomotic healing, including the microbiome, the mesentery, and geometry. As technology evolves, endoscopic approaches may improve anastomotic healing and in some cases may eliminate the anastomosis altogether. DISCUSSION: Much remains unknown regarding the mechanisms of anastomotic healing, and research should focus on elucidating the dynamics of healing at a molecular level. Doing so may help facilitate the transition from traditional surgical dogma to evidence-based medicine in the operating room.
Authors: Benjamin D Shogan; Daniel P Smith; Scott Christley; Jack A Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: Microbiome Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Ceylan Türlü; Nicholas Willumsen; Debora Marando; Peter Schjerling; Edyta Biskup; Jens Hannibal; Lars N Jorgensen; Magnus S Ågren Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 5.923