Literature DB >> 28299474

A Population-Based Cohort Study of Emergency Appendectomy Performed in England and New York State.

Waleed Al-Khyatt1, Jemma Mytton2, Benjamin H L Tan1, Christopher T Aquina3, Felicity Evison2, Fergal J Fleming3, Sandro Pasquali4, Ewen A Griffiths5, Ravinder S Vohra6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare selected outcomes (30-day reoperation and total length of hospital stay) following emergency appendectomy between populations from New York State and England.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used demographic and in-hospital outcome data from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) administrative databases for all patients aged 18+ years undergoing appendectomy between April 2009 and March 2014. Univariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression were used to test significant factors. A one-to-one propensity score matched dataset was created to compare odd ratios (OR) of reoperations between the two populations.
RESULTS: A total of 188,418 patient records, 121,428 (64.4%) from England and 66,990 (35.6%) from NYS, were extracted. Appendectomy was completed laparoscopically in 77.7% of patients in New York State compared to 53.6% in England (P < 0.001). The median lengths of hospital stay for patients undergoing appendectomy were 3 (interquartile range, IQR 2-4) days versus 2 (IQR 1-3) days (P < 0.001) in England and New York State, respectively. All 30-day reoperation rates were higher in England compared to New York State (1.2 vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001), representing nearly a twofold higher risk of 30-day reoperation (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.64-2.14, P < 0.001). As the proportion of appendectomy completed laparoscopically increased, there was a reduction in the reoperation rate in England (correlation coefficient -0.170, P = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: Reoperations and total length of hospital stay is significantly higher following appendectomy in England compared to New York State. Increasing the numbers of appendectomy completed laparoscopically may decrease length of stay and reoperations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28299474     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3981-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A meta-analysis of hospital 30-day avoidable readmission rates.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Alison Jennings; Alan J Forster
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  U.S. health system performance: a national scorecard.

Authors:  Cathy Schoen; Karen Davis; Sabrina K H How; Stephen C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  The impact of operative timing on outcomes of appendicitis: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Project analysis.

Authors:  Brett A Fair; John C Kubasiak; Imke Janssen; Jonathan A Myers; Keith W Millikan; Daniel J Deziel; Minh B Luu
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Bo Wei; Cui-Lling Qi; Tu-Feng Chen; Zong-Heng Zheng; Jiang-Long Huang; Bao-Guang Hu; Hong-Bo Wei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Declining Operative Experience for Junior-Level Residents: Is This an Unintended Consequence of Minimally Invasive Surgery?

Authors:  Matthew G Mullen; Elise P Salerno; Alex D Michaels; Traci L Hedrick; Min-Woong Sohn; Philip W Smith; Bruce D Schirmer; Charles M Friel
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Multicentre observational study of performance variation in provision and outcome of emergency appendicectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Surgical research and activity analysis using Hospital Episode Statistics.

Authors:  J P Slavin; M Deakin; R Wilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  1 in total

1.  Managing appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic-What do we need to know from the evidence?

Authors:  John M Findlay
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.149

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.