Literature DB >> 30831050

Proliferation saturation index in an adaptive Bayesian approach to predict patient-specific radiotherapy responses.

Enakshi D Sunassee1, Dean Tan1, Nathan Ji1, Renee Brady1, Eduardo G Moros2,3, Jimmy J Caudell2, Slav Yartsev4, Heiko Enderling1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Radiotherapy prescription dose and dose fractionation protocols vary little between individual patients having the same tumor grade and stage. To personalize radiotherapy a predictive model is needed to simulate radiation response. Previous modeling attempts with multiple variables and parameters have been shown to yield excellent data fits at the cost of non-identifiability and clinically unrealistic results. Materials and methods: We develop a mathematical model based on a proliferation saturation index (PSI) that is a measurement of pre-treatment tumor volume-to-carrying capacity ratio that modulates intrinsic tumor growth and radiation response rates. In an adaptive Bayesian approach, we utilize an increasing number of data points for individual patients to predict patient-specific responses to subsequent radiation doses.
Results: Model analysis shows that using PSI as the only patient-specific parameter, model simulations can fit longitudinal clinical data with high accuracy (R2=0.84). By analyzing tumor response to radiation using daily CT scans early in the treatment, response to the remaining treatment fractions can be predicted after two weeks with high accuracy (c-index = 0.89).
Conclusion: The PSI model may be suited to forecast treatment response for individual patients and offers actionable decision points for mid-treatment protocol adaptation. The presented work provides an actionable image-derived biomarker prior to and during therapy to personalize and adapt radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiotherapy; mathematical model; non-small cell lung cancer; proliferation saturation index; response prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30831050      PMCID: PMC7081883          DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1589013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  29 in total

1.  Ill-posed problem and regularization in reconstruction of radiobiological parameters from serial tumor imaging data.

Authors:  Alevei V Chvetsov; George A Sandison; Jeffrey L Schwartz; Ramesh Rengan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Altered fractionation schedules in radiation treatment: a review.

Authors:  Kamran A Ahmed; Candace R Correa; Thomas J Dilling; Nikhil G Rao; Ravi Shridhar; Andy M Trotti; Richard B Wilder; Jimmy J Caudell
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  The model muddle: in search of tumor growth laws.

Authors:  Philip Gerlee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Mathematical modeling of tumor growth and treatment.

Authors:  Heiko Enderling; Mark A J Chaplain
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

7.  Adaptive radiotherapy planning on decreasing gross tumor volumes as seen on megavoltage computed tomography images.

Authors:  Curtis Woodford; Slav Yartsev; A Rashid Dar; Glenn Bauman; Jake Van Dyk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Assessment of interpatient heterogeneity in tumor radiosensitivity for nonsmall cell lung cancer using tumor-volume variation data.

Authors:  Alexei V Chvetsov; Slav Yartsev; Jeffrey L Schwartz; Nina Mayr
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A proliferation saturation index to predict radiation response and personalize radiotherapy fractionation.

Authors:  Sotiris Prokopiou; Eduardo G Moros; Jan Poleszczuk; Jimmy Caudell; Javier F Torres-Roca; Kujtim Latifi; Jae K Lee; Robert Myerson; Louis B Harrison; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Prediction of Treatment Response for Combined Chemo- and Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Using a Bio-Mathematical Model.

Authors:  Changran Geng; Harald Paganetti; Clemens Grassberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Are all models wrong?

Authors:  Heiko Enderling; Olaf Wolkenhauer
Journal:  Comput Syst Oncol       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 2.  Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Guillermo Lorenzo; David A Hormuth; Ernesto A B F Lima; Kalina P Slavkova; Julie C DiCarlo; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Debra Patt; Caroline Chung; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  From Fitting the Average to Fitting the Individual: A Cautionary Tale for Mathematical Modelers.

Authors:  Michael C Luo; Elpiniki Nikolopoulou; Jana L Gevertz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Re: Simulation analysis for tumor radiotherapy based on three-component mathematical models.

Authors:  Meghan C Ferrall-Fairbanks; Daniel J Glazar; Renee J Brady; Gregory J Kimmel; Mohammad U Zahid; Philipp M Altrock; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Hybrid modeling frameworks of tumor development and treatment.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Chamseddine; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2019-07-17

Review 6.  Mathematical modeling of radiotherapy and its impact on tumor interactions with the immune system.

Authors:  Rebecca Anne Bekker; Sungjune Kim; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.218

7.  Forecasting tumor and vasculature response dynamics to radiation therapy via image based mathematical modeling.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Forecasting Individual Patient Response to Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer With a Dynamic Carrying Capacity Model.

Authors:  Mohammad U Zahid; Nuverah Mohsin; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jimmy J Caudell; Louis B Harrison; Clifton D Fuller; Eduardo G Moros; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 7.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.