Enakshi D Sunassee1, Dean Tan1, Nathan Ji1, Renee Brady1, Eduardo G Moros2,3, Jimmy J Caudell2, Slav Yartsev4, Heiko Enderling1,2. 1. Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute , Tampa , FL , USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute , Tampa , FL , USA. 3. Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute , Tampa , FL , USA. 4. London Health Sciences Centre, London Regional Cancer Program , London , ON , Canada.
Abstract
Purpose: Radiotherapy prescription dose and dose fractionation protocols vary little between individual patients having the same tumor grade and stage. To personalize radiotherapy a predictive model is needed to simulate radiation response. Previous modeling attempts with multiple variables and parameters have been shown to yield excellent data fits at the cost of non-identifiability and clinically unrealistic results. Materials and methods: We develop a mathematical model based on a proliferation saturation index (PSI) that is a measurement of pre-treatment tumor volume-to-carrying capacity ratio that modulates intrinsic tumor growth and radiation response rates. In an adaptive Bayesian approach, we utilize an increasing number of data points for individual patients to predict patient-specific responses to subsequent radiation doses. Results: Model analysis shows that using PSI as the only patient-specific parameter, model simulations can fit longitudinal clinical data with high accuracy (R2=0.84). By analyzing tumor response to radiation using daily CT scans early in the treatment, response to the remaining treatment fractions can be predicted after two weeks with high accuracy (c-index = 0.89). Conclusion: The PSI model may be suited to forecast treatment response for individual patients and offers actionable decision points for mid-treatment protocol adaptation. The presented work provides an actionable image-derived biomarker prior to and during therapy to personalize and adapt radiotherapy.
Purpose: Radiotherapy prescription dose and dose fractionation protocols vary little between individual patients having the same tumor grade and stage. To personalize radiotherapy a predictive model is needed to simulate radiation response. Previous modeling attempts with multiple variables and parameters have been shown to yield excellent data fits at the cost of non-identifiability and clinically unrealistic results. Materials and methods: We develop a mathematical model based on a proliferation saturation index (PSI) that is a measurement of pre-treatment tumor volume-to-carrying capacity ratio that modulates intrinsic tumor growth and radiation response rates. In an adaptive Bayesian approach, we utilize an increasing number of data points for individual patients to predict patient-specific responses to subsequent radiation doses. Results: Model analysis shows that using PSI as the only patient-specific parameter, model simulations can fit longitudinal clinical data with high accuracy (R2=0.84). By analyzing tumor response to radiation using daily CT scans early in the treatment, response to the remaining treatment fractions can be predicted after two weeks with high accuracy (c-index = 0.89). Conclusion: The PSI model may be suited to forecast treatment response for individual patients and offers actionable decision points for mid-treatment protocol adaptation. The presented work provides an actionable image-derived biomarker prior to and during therapy to personalize and adapt radiotherapy.
Authors: Kamran A Ahmed; Candace R Correa; Thomas J Dilling; Nikhil G Rao; Ravi Shridhar; Andy M Trotti; Richard B Wilder; Jimmy J Caudell Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2014-10-06 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Sotiris Prokopiou; Eduardo G Moros; Jan Poleszczuk; Jimmy Caudell; Javier F Torres-Roca; Kujtim Latifi; Jae K Lee; Robert Myerson; Louis B Harrison; Heiko Enderling Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Chengyue Wu; Guillermo Lorenzo; David A Hormuth; Ernesto A B F Lima; Kalina P Slavkova; Julie C DiCarlo; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Debra Patt; Caroline Chung; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Biophys Rev (Melville) Date: 2022-05-17
Authors: Meghan C Ferrall-Fairbanks; Daniel J Glazar; Renee J Brady; Gregory J Kimmel; Mohammad U Zahid; Philipp M Altrock; Heiko Enderling Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Mohammad U Zahid; Nuverah Mohsin; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jimmy J Caudell; Louis B Harrison; Clifton D Fuller; Eduardo G Moros; Heiko Enderling Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 7.038