Literature DB >> 10659934

The contextual nature of medical information.

M Berg1, E Goorman.   

Abstract

Successful design of information systems in health care starts with a thorough understanding of the practices in which the systems are to function. In this paper, we discuss the nature of 'medical information' from a sociological perspective. We focus on the (im)possibilities of the utilization of primary health care data for secondary purposes such as research and administration. In much of the literature on EPRs, this secondary utilization is only seen to depend on the question whether the IT connections are in place. It is then simply a matter of selecting which information to transport and to where. In this article, we argue that this view of medical information is mistaken. Information should be conceptualized as always entangled with the context of its production. The disentangling of information from its production context is possible, but that entails work. We propose the following 'law of medical information': the further information has to be able to circulate (i.e. the more diverse contexts it has to be usable in), the more work is required to disentangle the information from the context of its production. The question that then becomes pertinent is; who has to do this work, and who reaps the benefits?

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10659934     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00041-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  24 in total

1.  Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Marc Berg; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Effect of XML markup on retrieval of clinical documents.

Authors:  Catherine Arnott Smith
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  A user-centered, object-oriented methodology for developing Health Information Systems: a Clinical Information System (CIS) example.

Authors:  Georgios Konstantinidis; George C Anastassopoulos; Alexandros S Karakos; Emmanouil Anagnostou; Vasileios Danielides
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Larry D Gamm
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Evaluation of a generalizable approach to clinical information retrieval using the automated retrieval console (ARC).

Authors:  Leonard W D'Avolio; Thien M Nguyen; Wildon R Farwell; Yongming Chen; Felicia Fitzmeyer; Owen M Harris; Louis D Fiore
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  National programme for IT: the pound sterling 30 billion question.

Authors:  John Williams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Measuring the quality of referral letters about patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Authors:  M Jiwa; M Coleman; R K McKinley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Annotations for the collaboration of the health professionals.

Authors:  Sandra Bringay; Catherine Barry; Jean Charlet
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

9.  Contextual implementation model: a framework for assisting clinical information system implementations.

Authors:  Joanne L Callen; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care.

Authors:  Nikki Rousseau; Elaine McColl; John Newton; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin Eccles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.