Literature DB >> 11673101

Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism.

B Kaplan1.   

Abstract

A review of evaluation literature concerning CDSSs indicates that randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are the 'gold standard' for evaluation. While this approach is excellent for studying system or clinical performance, it is not well suited to answering questions concerning whether systems will be used or how they will be used. Because lack of use of CDSS has been of concern for some years, other evaluation research designs are needed to address those issues. This paper critiques RCT and experimental evaluation approaches and presents alternative approaches to evaluation that address questions outside the scope of the usual RCT and experimental designs. A wide range of literature is summarized to illustrate the value of evaluations that take into account social, organizational, professional, and other contextual considerations. Many of these studies go beyond the usual measures of systems performance or physicians' behavior by focusing on 'fit' of the system with other aspects of professional and organizational life. Because there is little explicit theory that informs many evaluations, the paper then reviews CDSS evaluations informed by social science theories. Lastly, it proposes a theoretical social science base of social interactionism. An example of such an approach is given. It involves a CDSS in psychiatry and is based on Kaplan's 4Cs, which focus on communication, control, care, and context. Although the example is a CDSS, the evaluation approach also is useful for clinical guideline implementation and other medical informatics applications. Similarly, although the discussion is about social interactionism, the more important point is the need to broaden evaluation through a variety of methods and approaches that investigate social, cultural, organizational, cognitive, and other contextual concerns. Methodological pluralism and a variety of research questions can increase understanding of many influences concerning informatics applications development and deployment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11673101     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00184-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  94 in total

1.  Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  I Sim; P Gorman; R A Greenes; R B Haynes; B Kaplan; H Lehmann; P C Tang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.

Authors:  M J Van Der Meijden; H J Tange; J Troost; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The impact of electronic health records on care of heart failure patients in the emergency room.

Authors:  Donald P Connelly; Young-Taek Park; Jing Du; Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt; Bradley D Gordon; Barry A Bershow; Raymond A Gensinger; Michael Shrift; Daniel T Routhe; Stuart M Speedie
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center.

Authors:  Jos Aarts; Hans Doorewaard; Marc Berg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  Tracy Finch; Carl May; Frances Mair; Maggie Mort; Linda Gask
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-22

6.  Organisational culture matters for system integration in health care.

Authors:  Samina K Munir; Stephen Kay
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

Review 7.  Clinical decision support provided within physician order entry systems: a systematic review of features effective for changing clinician behavior.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; David F Lobach
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

8.  Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation.

Authors:  Carl May; Robert Harrison; Tracy Finch; Anne MacFarlane; Frances Mair; Paul Wallace
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A user-centered, object-oriented methodology for developing Health Information Systems: a Clinical Information System (CIS) example.

Authors:  Georgios Konstantinidis; George C Anastassopoulos; Alexandros S Karakos; Emmanouil Anagnostou; Vasileios Danielides
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 10.  The design of decisions: Matching clinical decision support recommendations to Nielsen's design heuristics.

Authors:  Kristen Miller; Muge Capan; Danielle Weldon; Yaman Noaiseh; Rebecca Kowalski; Rachel Kraft; Sanford Schwartz; William S Weintraub; Ryan Arnold
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.