Literature DB >> 25583504

Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion.

Sharon Gilaie-Dotan1, Ayse Pinar Saygin2, Lauren J Lorenzi3, Geraint Rees4, Marlene Behrmann5.   

Abstract

Identifying the movements of those around us is fundamental for many daily activities, such as recognizing actions, detecting predators, and interacting with others socially. A key question concerns the neurobiological substrates underlying biological motion perception. Although the ventral "form" visual cortex is standardly activated by biologically moving stimuli, whether these activations are functionally critical for biological motion perception or are epiphenomenal remains unknown. To address this question, we examined whether focal damage to regions of the ventral visual cortex, resulting in significant deficits in form perception, adversely affects biological motion perception. Six patients with damage to the ventral cortex were tested with sensitive point-light display paradigms. All patients were able to recognize unmasked point-light displays and their perceptual thresholds were not significantly different from those of three different control groups, one of which comprised brain-damaged patients with spared ventral cortex (n > 50). Importantly, these six patients performed significantly better than patients with damage to regions critical for biological motion perception. To assess the necessary contribution of different regions in the ventral pathway to biological motion perception, we complement the behavioral findings with a fine-grained comparison between the lesion location and extent, and the cortical regions standardly implicated in biological motion processing. This analysis revealed that the ventral aspects of the form pathway (e.g., fusiform regions, ventral extrastriate body area) are not critical for biological motion perception. We hypothesize that the role of these ventral regions is to provide enhanced multiview/posture representations of the moving person rather than to represent biological motion perception per se.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EBA; action perception; point-light displays; ventral stream; visual form agnosia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25583504      PMCID: PMC4313798          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414974112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  74 in total

1.  Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion.

Authors:  E Grossman; M Donnelly; R Price; D Pickens; V Morgan; G Neighbor; R Blake
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Seeing pedestrians at night: visual clutter does not mask biological motion.

Authors:  Richard A Tyrrell; Joanne M Wood; Alex Chaparro; Trent P Carberry; Byoung-Sun Chu; Ralph P Marszalek
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2009-02-21

3.  Perception of biological motion.

Authors:  V Ahlström; R Blake; U Ahlström
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Effects of TMS over premotor and superior temporal cortices on biological motion perception.

Authors:  Bianca Michelle van Kemenade; Neil Muggleton; Vincent Walsh; Ayse Pinar Saygin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.

Authors:  Thomas Habekost; Anders Petersen; Marlene Behrmann; Randi Starrfelt
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Visual motion perception after brain damage: II. Deficits in form-from-motion perception.

Authors:  T Schenk; J Zihl
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Seeing with profoundly deactivated mid-level visual areas: non-hierarchical functioning in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Anat Perry; Yoram Bonneh; Rafael Malach; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  The neural basis of visual body perception.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Neuroanatomical correlates of biological motion detection.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Ryota Kanai; Bahador Bahrami; Geraint Rees; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  12 in total

1.  A new technique for generating disordered point-light animations for the study of biological motion perception.

Authors:  Jejoong Kim; Eunice L Jung; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Structural and effective brain connectivity underlying biological motion detection.

Authors:  Arseny A Sokolov; Peter Zeidman; Michael Erb; Philippe Ryvlin; Karl J Friston; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Heritable aspects of biological motion perception and its covariation with autistic traits.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Li Wang; Qian Xu; Dong Liu; Lihong Chen; Nikolaus F Troje; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Face-selective regions differ in their ability to classify facial expressions.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Shruti Japee; Rachel Nolan; Carlton Chu; Ning Liu; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Perception of biological motion from size-invariant body representations.

Authors:  Markus Lappe; Karin Wittinghofer; Marc H E de Lussanet
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24

6.  Natural Translating Locomotion Modulates Cortical Activity at Action Observation.

Authors:  Thierry Pozzo; Alberto Inuggi; Alejo Keuroghlanian; Stefano Panzeri; Ghislain Saunier; Claudio Campus
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07

7.  Attraction of posture and motion-trajectory elements of conspecific biological motion in medaka fish.

Authors:  Atsushi Shibai; Tsunehiro Arimoto; Tsukasa Yoshinaga; Yuta Tsuchizawa; Dashdavaa Khureltulga; Zuben P Brown; Taishi Kakizuka; Kazufumi Hosoda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cognitive estimation: Performance of patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions.

Authors:  Lisa Cipolotti; Sarah E MacPherson; Sara Gharooni; Natasja van-Harskamp; Tim Shallice; Edgar Chan; Parashkev Nachev
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Differential sustained and transient temporal processing across visual streams.

Authors:  Anthony Stigliani; Brianna Jeska; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A comparison of form processing involved in the perception of biological and nonbiological movements.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.