Literature DB >> 22264195

Effects of TMS over premotor and superior temporal cortices on biological motion perception.

Bianca Michelle van Kemenade1, Neil Muggleton, Vincent Walsh, Ayse Pinar Saygin.   

Abstract

Using MRI-guided off-line TMS, we targeted two areas implicated in biological motion processing: ventral premotor cortex (PMC) and posterior STS (pSTS), plus a control site (vertex). Participants performed a detection task on noise-masked point-light displays of human animations and scrambled versions of the same stimuli. Perceptual thresholds were determined individually. Performance was measured before and after 20 sec of continuous theta burst stimulation of PMC, pSTS, and control (each tested on different days). A matched nonbiological object motion task (detecting point-light displays of translating polygons) served as a further control. Data were analyzed within the signal detection framework. Sensitivity (d') significantly decreased after TMS of PMC. There was a marginally significant decline in d' after TMS of pSTS but not of control site. Criterion (response bias) was also significantly affected by TMS over PMC. Specifically, subjects made significantly more false alarms post-TMS of PMC. These effects were specific to biological motion and not found for the nonbiological control task. To summarize, we report that TMS over PMC reduces sensitivity to biological motion perception. Furthermore, pSTS and PMC may have distinct roles in biological motion processing as behavioral performance differs following TMS in each area. Only TMS over PMC led to a significant increase in false alarms, which was not found for other brain areas or for the control task. TMS of PMC may have interfered with refining judgments about biological motion perception, possibly because access to the perceiver's own motor representations was compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22264195     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  30 in total

1.  Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations.

Authors:  Joris Vangeneugden; Marius V Peelen; Duje Tadin; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Interactions between visual and motor areas during the recognition of plausible actions as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Anastasia Pavlidou; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Lange
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Global versus local: double dissociation between MT+ and V3A in motion processing revealed using continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Peng Cai; Nihong Chen; Tiangang Zhou; Benjamin Thompson; Fang Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Tinbergen on mirror neurons.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Neural underpinnings of superior action prediction abilities in soccer players.

Authors:  Stergios Makris; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Lauren J Lorenzi; Geraint Rees; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Typical action perception and interpretation without motor simulation.

Authors:  Gilles Vannuscorps; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Increased functional coupling of the left amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex during the perception of communicative point-light stimuli.

Authors:  Imme C Zillekens; Marie-Luise Brandi; Juha M Lahnakoski; Atesh Koul; Valeria Manera; Cristina Becchio; Leonhard Schilbach
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Sex differences in the development of brain mechanisms for processing biological motion.

Authors:  L C Anderson; D Z Bolling; S Schelinski; M C Coffman; K A Pelphrey; M D Kaiser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.