Literature DB >> 26826513

Face-selective regions differ in their ability to classify facial expressions.

Hui Zhang1, Shruti Japee2, Rachel Nolan2, Carlton Chu2, Ning Liu2, Leslie G Ungerleider2.   

Abstract

Recognition of facial expressions is crucial for effective social interactions. Yet, the extent to which the various face-selective regions in the human brain classify different facial expressions remains unclear. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and support vector machine pattern classification analysis to determine how well face-selective brain regions are able to decode different categories of facial expression. Subjects participated in a slow event-related fMRI experiment in which they were shown 32 face pictures, portraying four different expressions: neutral, fearful, angry, and happy and belonging to eight different identities. Our results showed that only the amygdala and the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) were able to accurately discriminate between these expressions, albeit in different ways: the amygdala discriminated fearful faces from non-fearful faces, whereas STS discriminated neutral from emotional (fearful, angry and happy) faces. In contrast to these findings on the classification of emotional expression, only the fusiform face area (FFA) and anterior inferior temporal cortex (aIT) could discriminate among the various facial identities. Further, the amygdala and STS were better than FFA and aIT at classifying expression, while FFA and aIT were better than the amygdala and STS at classifying identity. Taken together, our findings indicate that the decoding of facial emotion and facial identity occurs in different neural substrates: the amygdala and STS for the former and FFA and aIT for the latter. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amygdala; Emotional faces; STS; SVM; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26826513      PMCID: PMC4808360          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  69 in total

1.  Loci of the release from fMRI adaptation for changes in facial expression, identity, and viewpoint.

Authors:  Xiaokun Xu; Irving Biederman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Exceeding chance level by chance: The caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy.

Authors:  Etienne Combrisson; Karim Jerbi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Processing of facial emotion in the human fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  Hiroto Kawasaki; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christopher K Kovach; Kirill V Nourski; Hiroyuki Oya; Matthew A Howard; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Distributed representations of dynamic facial expressions in the superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; Christopher D Moore; Andrew D Engell; Alexander Todorov; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceptual and anatomic patterns of selective deficits in facial identity and expression processing.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; Hashim M Hanif; Giuseppe Iaria; Bradley C Duchaine; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing.

Authors:  Patrik Vuilleumier; Mark P Richardson; Jorge L Armony; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-24       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: an fMRI adaptation study.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; So Young Moon; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain.

Authors:  Richard J Harris; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stimulus-driven and strategic neural responses to fearful and happy facial expressions in humans.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Francis McGlone; David F Abbott; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Emotional expressions evoke a differential response in the fusiform face area.

Authors:  Bronson Harry; Mark A Williams; Chris Davis; Jeesun Kim
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  FFA and OFA Encode Distinct Types of Face Identity Information.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Katherine Storrs; Adrian Lloyd Williams; Carolyn McGettigan; Lúcia Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Posterior Fusiform and Midfusiform Contribute to Distinct Stages of Facial Expression Processing.

Authors:  Yuanning Li; R Mark Richardson; Avniel Singh Ghuman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  tDCS application over the STG improves the ability to recognize and appreciate elements involved in humor processing.

Authors:  Mirella Manfredi; Alice Mado Proverbio; Ana Paula Gonçalves Donate; Sofia Macarini Gonçalves Vieira; William Edgar Comfort; Mariana De Araújo Andreoli; Paulo Sérgio Boggio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Lauren E Vucovich; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Curvature processing in human visual cortical areas.

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Sophia Robert; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Blunted neural response to emotional faces in the fusiform and superior temporal gyrus may be marker of emotion recognition deficits in pediatric epilepsy.

Authors:  Michele Morningstar; Andy Hung; Connor Grannis; Roberto C French; Whitney I Mattson; Adam P Ostendorf; Satyanarayana Gedela; Dario J Englot; Eric E Nelson
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.937

7.  Spatiotemporal dynamics in human visual cortex rapidly encode the emotional content of faces.

Authors:  Diana C Dima; Gavin Perry; Eirini Messaritaki; Jiaxiang Zhang; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Linear Representation of Emotions in Whole Persons by Combining Facial and Bodily Expressions in the Extrastriate Body Area.

Authors:  Xiaoli Yang; Junhai Xu; Linjing Cao; Xianglin Li; Peiyuan Wang; Bin Wang; Baolin Liu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.