| Literature DB >> 25580290 |
Zoltán Rózsavölgyi1, Domokos Boda2, Andrea Hajnal1, Krisztina Boda3, Attila Somfay1.
Abstract
Introduction. Since its first publication in the medical literature, an extremely large number of references have demonstrated that the tonometric measurement of tissue perfusion is a reliable indicator of the actual condition of critically ill patients. Later a new method was developed by the introduction of sublingual tonometry for the determination of tissue perfusion. In comparison with gastric tonometry, the new method was simpler and could even be used in awake patients. Unfortunately, at present, because of severe failures of manufacturing, the device is withdrawn from commerce. Materials and Methods. In this study, we present a new method using a newly developed tool for the PslCO2 measurement in sublingual tonometry as well as the data for its validation in vitro and in vivo and the results of 25 volunteers and 54 COPD patients belonging to different GOLD groups at their hospitalization due to the acute exacerbation of the disease but already in a stable condition at the time of the examination. Results and Conclusion. The results of the performed examinations showed that the method is suitable for monitoring the actual condition of the patients by mucosal perfusion tonometry in the sublingual region.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25580290 PMCID: PMC4280804 DOI: 10.1155/2014/534130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care Res Pract ISSN: 2090-1305
Figure 1Scheme of the sublingual tonometer.
Clinical data of the study population.
| COPD GOLD groups | II | III | IV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 15 | 22 | 17 |
| Sex (male/female) number | 9/6 | 13/9 | 14/3 |
| Age, years | 60.7 ± 8.2 | 63 ± 16.2 | 57 ± 8.1 |
| Body weight | 77.6 ± 24.0 | 65.8 ± 16.2 | 77.2 ± 16.5 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.4 ± 7.2 | 23.4 ± 4.0 | 27.1 ± 5.8 |
| O2 therapy (+/−) | 3/12 | 5/17 | 15/2 |
| Smoking, pack-year | 41.8 ± 24.1 | 36.7 ± 26.3 | 38.3 ± 23.5 |
Values given as mean ± SD.
Figure 2Experimental CO2 uptake by the sublingual probe after given equilibration times. Values expressed as percentages of the reference data. In vitro at 37°C (▲), equation: y = 100(1 − e −1.101), and in vivo (●), equation: y = 100(1 − e −0.265).
Sublingual PCO2, arterialized capillary blood PCO2, and pH values in healthy controls and COPD patients.
| PslCO2
| PcCO2
| PslCO2 − PcCO2
| pH# | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy controls | ||||
| Number | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Mean ± SD | 39.7 ± 2.8 | 37.7 ± 1.3e | 2.0 ± 3.1 | 7.43 ± 0.02 |
| COPD stage II | ||||
| Number | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Mean ± SD | 37.4 ± 5.2 | 36.6 ± 3.0 | 0.8 ± 4.5 | 7.43 ± 0.02 |
| COPD stage III | ||||
| Number | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
| Mean ± SD | 43.5 ± 8.1 | 41.2 ± 4.6 | 2.3 ± 6.7 | 7.43 ± 0.02 |
| COPD stage IV | ||||
| Number | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| Mean ± SD | 51.6 ± 8.8a | 49.9 ± 8.2a | 1.6 ± 4.2 | 7.41 ± 0.03 |
| COPD in all cases | ||||
| Number | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 |
| Mean ± SD | 44.4 ± 9.3 | 42.7 ± 7.7 | 1.7 ± 5.4 | 7.42 ± 0.02 |
PslCO2, carbon dioxide sublingual partial pressure; PcCO2, carbon dioxide arterialized capillary partial pressure; cpH, arterialized capillary pH; * P < 0.0001, ANOVA result for comparison of the four groups; # P > 0.05, ANOVA result for comparison of the four groups; a P < 0.001, compared to the other groups; b P < 0.05, compared to COPD II and COPD III; c P < 0.0001, compared to COPD II and COPD III; d P < 0.001, compared to COPD III and COPD IV; e P > 0.05, compared to PslCO2.
Testing under hyperventilation in healthy volunteers.
| PslCO2
| PcCO2
| |
|---|---|---|
| Control, normal ventilation to 5 min. | ||
| Number | 10 | 10 |
| Mean ± SD | 27.2 ± 3.1 | 37.7 ± 1.3 |
| Control, hyperventilation to 5 min. | ||
| Number | 10 | 10 |
| Mean ± SD | 20.8 ± 3.4 | 20.4 ± 2.8 |
PslCO2, carbon dioxide sublingual partial pressure; PcCO2, carbon dioxide arterialized capillary partial pressure.
Differences of blood gas parameters measured in the simultaneously sampled arterial blood and of the arterialized capillary blood in COPD patient with various conditions.
| Differences in | pH | PCO2
|
|---|---|---|
| Number | 15 | 15 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.0013 ± 0.011 | 0.333 ± 1.345 |
| Max–min | 0.02–0 | 3–0 |