Literature DB >> 12626990

Sublingual capnometry versus traditional markers of tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients.

Paul E Marik1, Aleksandr Bankov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of sublingual PCO2 (P(SL)CO2), lactate concentration, and mixed venous oxygen saturation (S(MV)O2) in hemodynamically unstable intensive care patients and, additionally, to compare the temporal changes of these variables in response to treatment.
SETTING: Medical/surgical intensive care unit.
SUBJECTS: Fifty-four patients, mean age 58 +/- 8 yrs.
INTERVENTIONS: Oxyhemodynamic variables, arterial lactate concentration, and P(SL)CO2 were recorded in unselected sequential intensive care patients undergoing pulmonary artery catheterization. A data set was obtained immediately after insertion of the pulmonary artery catheter and repeated 4 and 8 hrs later.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had severe sepsis or septic shock. Twenty-seven (50%) patients died. The initial P(SL)CO2_PaCO2 gradient (P(SL)CO2-diff) and the initial P(SL)CO2 were highly predictive of outcome (p =.0004 and p =.004, respectively); however, there was no difference in the arterial lactate concentration and S(MV)O2 between the survivors and nonsurvivors. The P(SL)CO2-diff had the best receiver operator characteristic characteristics (area under the curve, 0.75), with a P(SL)CO2-diff >25 mm Hg being the best discriminator of outcome. With treatment, the P(SL)CO2-diff decreased in both survivors and nonsurvivors; however, the lactate and S(MV)O2 remained relatively unchanged during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: The baseline P(SL)CO2-diff and P(SL)CO2 were better predictors of outcome than traditional markers of tissue hypoxia and were more responsive to therapeutic interventions. The P(SL)CO2-diff and/or P(SL)CO2 may prove to be a useful marker for goal-directed therapy and for assessing the response to clinical interventions aimed at improving tissue oxygenation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12626990     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054862.74829.EA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  24 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring CO2 in shock states.

Authors:  Pierre-Eric Danin; Nils Siegenthaler; Jacques Levraut; Gilles Bernardin; Jean Dellamonica; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Critical care issues in the early management of severe trauma.

Authors:  Alberto Garcia
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 3.  Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion.

Authors:  Alexandre Lima; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 5.  Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Diamantino Salgado; Raphaël Favory; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Tissue capnometry: does the answer lie under the tongue?

Authors:  Alexandre Toledo Maciel; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Hemodynamic management of cardiovascular failure by using PCO(2) venous-arterial difference.

Authors:  Martin Dres; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Transfusion in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Tine François; Guillaume Emeriaud; Oliver Karam; Marisa Tucci
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

9.  Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Mitchell Levy; Peter J D Andrews; Jean Chastre; Leonard D Hudson; Constantine Manthous; G Umberto Meduri; Rui P Moreno; Christian Putensen; Thomas Stewart; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Sublingual capnometry tracks microcirculatory changes in septic patients.

Authors:  Jacques Creteur; Daniel De Backer; Yasser Sakr; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.