Literature DB >> 25577214

Tribological and mechanical performance evaluation of metal prosthesis components manufactured via metal injection molding.

Virginia Melli1, Mateusz Juszczyk, Enrico Sandrini, Giovanni Bolelli, Benedetta Bonferroni, Luca Lusvarghi, Alberto Cigada, Tiziano Manfredini, Luigi De Nardo.   

Abstract

The increasing number of total joint replacements, in particular for the knee joint, has a growing impact on the healthcare system costs. New cost-saving manufacturing technologies are being explored nowadays. Metal injection molding (MIM) has already demonstrated its suitability for the production of CoCrMo alloy tibial trays, with a significant reduction in production costs, by holding both corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. In this work, mechanical and tribological properties were evaluated on tibial trays obtained via MIM and conventional investment casting. Surface hardness and wear properties were evaluated through Vickers hardness, scratch and pin on disk tests. The MIM and cast finished tibial trays were then subjected to a fatigue test campaign in order to obtain their fatigue load limit at 5 millions cycles following ISO 14879-1 directions. CoCrMo cast alloy exhibited 514 HV hardness compared to 335 HV of MIM alloy, furthermore it developed narrower scratches with a higher tendency towards microploughing than microcutting, in comparison to MIM CoCrMo. The observed fatigue limits were (1,766 ± 52) N for cast tibial trays and (1,625 ± 44) N for MIM ones. Fracture morphologies pointed out to a more brittle behavior of MIM microstructure. These aspects were attributed to the absence of a fine toughening and surface hardening carbide dispersion in MIM grains. Nevertheless, MIM tibial trays exhibited a fatigue limit far beyond the 900 N of maximum load prescribed by ISO and ASTM standards for the clinical application of these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25577214     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5332-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  13 in total

Review 1.  Strength requirements for internal and external prostheses.

Authors:  J P Paul
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  A review of metallic, ceramic and surface-treated metals used for bearing surfaces in human joint replacements.

Authors:  P A Dearnley
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Contact stresses and fatigue life in a knee prosthesis: comparison between in vitro measurements and computational simulations.

Authors:  Tomaso Villa; Francesco Migliavacca; Dario Gastaldi; Maurizio Colombo; Riccardo Pietrabissa
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects.

Authors:  I Kutzner; B Heinlein; F Graichen; A Bender; A Rohlmann; A Halder; A Beier; G Bergmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Fatigue resistance analysis of tibial baseplate in total knee prosthesis--an in vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tzai-Chiu Yu; Chang-Hung Huang; Chia-Hsun Hsieh; Jiann-Jong Liau; Chun-Hsiung Huang; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 6.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Hiroaki Takadama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  What's next? Alternative materials for articulation in total joint replacement.

Authors:  R Sonntag; J Reinders; J P Kretzer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Evaluation of a testing method for the fatigue performance of total knee tibial trays.

Authors:  S P Ahir; G W Blunn; H Haider; P S Walker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; Paul M Lichstein; Chao Shen; Anthony T Tokarski; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.