Literature DB >> 20537336

Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects.

I Kutzner1, B Heinlein, F Graichen, A Bender, A Rohlmann, A Halder, A Beier, G Bergmann.   

Abstract

Detailed knowledge about loading of the knee joint is essential for preclinical testing of implants, validation of musculoskeletal models and biomechanical understanding of the knee joint. The contact forces and moments acting on the tibial component were therefore measured in 5 subjects in vivo by an instrumented knee implant during various activities of daily living. Average peak resultant forces, in percent of body weight, were highest during stair descending (346% BW), followed by stair ascending (316% BW), level walking (261% BW), one legged stance (259% BW), knee bending (253% BW), standing up (246% BW), sitting down (225% BW) and two legged stance (107% BW). Peak shear forces were about 10-20 times smaller than the axial force. Resultant forces acted almost vertically on the tibial plateau even during high flexion. Highest moments acted in the frontal plane with a typical peak to peak range -2.91% BWm (adduction moment) to 1.61% BWm (abduction moment) throughout all activities. Peak flexion/extension moments ranged between -0.44% BWm (extension moment) and 3.16% BWm (flexion moment). Peak external/internal torques lay between -1.1% BWm (internal torque) and 0.53% BWm (external torque). The knee joint is highly loaded during daily life. In general, resultant contact forces during dynamic activities were lower than the ones predicted by many mathematical models, but lay in a similar range as measured in vivo by others. Some of the observed load components were much higher than those currently applied when testing knee implants. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537336     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  158 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  [Anterior meniscotibial ligaments. Forces under various load conditions].

Authors:  A M Seitz; R Kasisari; A Lubomierski; A Ignatius; L Dürselen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Forces acting on the anterior meniscotibial ligaments.

Authors:  Andreas Seitz; Riza Kasisari; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Direct comparison of measured and calculated total knee replacement force envelopes during walking in the presence of normal and abnormal gait patterns.

Authors:  Hannah J Lundberg; Kharma C Foucher; Thomas P Andriacchi; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Concurrent prediction of muscle and tibiofemoral contact forces during treadmill gait.

Authors:  Trent M Guess; Antonis P Stylianou; Mohammad Kia
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Loading conditions of the knee: what does it mean?

Authors:  Roland Becker; Sebastian Kopf; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Influences of alignment and obesity on knee joint loading in osteoarthritic gait.

Authors:  S P Messier; M Pater; D P Beavers; C Legault; R F Loeser; D J Hunter; P DeVita
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  The increase in posterior tibial slope provides a positive biomechanical effect in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Sae Kwang Kwon; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Knee kinetics and kinematics: What are the effects of TKA malconfigurations?

Authors:  Silvia Pianigiani; Luc Labey; Walter Pascale; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.