Literature DB >> 25574347

Review of recent results using computational fluid dynamics simulations in patients receiving mechanical assist devices for end-stage heart failure.

Mina Berty Farag1, Christof Karmonik2, Fabian Rengier1, Matthias Loebe2, Matthias Karck1, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk3, Arjang Ruhparwar1, Sasan Partovi4.   

Abstract

Many end-stage heart failure patients are not eligible to undergo heart transplantation due to organ shortage, and even those under consideration for transplantation might suffer long waiting periods. A better understanding of the hemodynamic impact of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) on the cardiovascular system is therefore of great interest. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations give the opportunity to study the hemodynamics in this patient population using clinical imaging data such as computed tomographic angiography. This article reviews a recent study series involving patients with pulsatile and constant-flow LVAD devices in which CFD simulations were used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess blood flow dynamics in the thoracic aorta, demonstrating its potential to enhance the information available from medical imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational fluid dynamics; heart failure; left ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25574347      PMCID: PMC4280244          DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-10-3-185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1947-6108


  33 in total

1.  The effect of LVAD aortic outflow-graft placement on hemodynamics and flow: Implantation technique and computer flow modeling.

Authors:  Biswajit Kar; Reynolds M Delgado; O H Frazier; Igor D Gregoric; Matthew T Harting; Yasmin Wadia; Timothy J Myers; Robert D Moser; Jonathan Freund
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

2.  Vascular pulsatility in patients with a pulsatile- or continuous-flow ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Adam R Travis; Guruprasad A Giridharan; George M Pantalos; Robert D Dowling; Sumanth D Prabhu; Mark S Slaughter; Mike Sobieski; Akif Undar; David J Farrar; Steven C Koenig
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Differences in pulsatile and non-pulsatile mechanical circulatory support in long-term use.

Authors:  Thorsten Drews; Michael Jurmann; Dandel Michael; Pasic Miralem; Yuguo Weng; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  The effect of aortic valve incompetence on the hemodynamics of a continuous flow ventricular assist device in a mock circulation.

Authors:  Mario A Zamarripa Garcia; Luz A Enriquez; Walter Dembitsky; Karen May-Newman
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Is bridge to recovery more likely with pulsatile left ventricular assist devices than with nonpulsatile-flow systems?

Authors:  Thomas Krabatsch; Martin Schweiger; Michael Dandel; Alexander Stepanenko; Thorsten Drews; Evgenij Potapov; Miralem Pasic; Yu-Guo Weng; Michael Huebler; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  The development of aortic insufficiency in left ventricular assist device-supported patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Cowger; Francis D Pagani; Jonathan W Haft; Matthew A Romano; Keith D Aaronson; Theodore J Kolias
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Hemodynamic responses to continuous versus pulsatile mechanical unloading of the failing left ventricle.

Authors:  Carlo R Bartoli; Guruprasad A Giridharan; Kenneth N Litwak; Michael Sobieski; Sumanth D Prabhu; Mark S Slaughter; Steven C Koenig
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Less frequent opening of the aortic valve and a continuous flow pump are risk factors for postoperative onset of aortic insufficiency in patients with a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Masaru Hatano; Koichiro Kinugawa; Taro Shiga; Naoko Kato; Miyoko Endo; Motoyuki Hisagi; Takashi Nishimura; Atsushi Yao; Yasunobu Hirata; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Ryozo Nagai
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Native aortic valve insufficiency in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ayesha S Bryant; William L Holman; Navin C Nanda; Srinivas Vengala; Margaret S Blood; Salpy V Pamboukian; James K Kirklin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Results of a multicenter clinical trial with the Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Steven S Tsui; Aly El-Banayosy; Benjamin C Sun; Robert L Kormos; Dale K Mueller; H Todd Massey; Timothy B Icenogle; David J Farrar; J Donald Hill
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  4 in total

1.  LVAD Outflow Graft Angle and Thrombosis Risk.

Authors:  Alberto Aliseda; Venkat Keshav Chivukula; Patrick Mcgah; Anthony R Prisco; Jennifer A Beckman; Guilherme J M Garcia; Nahush A Mokadam; Claudius Mahr
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Intermittent Aortic Valve Opening and Risk of Thrombosis in Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

Authors:  Claudius Mahr; Venkat Keshav Chivukula; Patrick McGah; Anthony R Prisco; Jennifer A Beckman; Nahush A Mokadam; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Hemodynamic analysis for stenosis microfluidic model of thrombosis with refined computational fluid dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Yunduo Charles Zhao; Parham Vatankhah; Tiffany Goh; Rhys Michelis; Kiarash Kyanian; Yingqi Zhang; Zhiyong Li; Lining Arnold Ju
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Paul D Morris; Andrew Narracott; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Daniel Alejandro Silva Soto; Sarah Hsiao; Angela Lungu; Paul Evans; Neil W Bressloff; Patricia V Lawford; D Rodney Hose; Julian P Gunn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.994

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.