Literature DB >> 21444064

Is bridge to recovery more likely with pulsatile left ventricular assist devices than with nonpulsatile-flow systems?

Thomas Krabatsch1, Martin Schweiger, Michael Dandel, Alexander Stepanenko, Thorsten Drews, Evgenij Potapov, Miralem Pasic, Yu-Guo Weng, Michael Huebler, Roland Hetzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weaning from left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) after myocardial recovery in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is a clinical option. With the broad application of continuous-flow pumps, we observed a decrease in the numbers of possible LVAD explanations due to myocardial recovery in these particular patients. We investigated this phenomenon and its causes.
METHODS: Between July 1992 and December 2009, 387 patients (age, 0.1 to 82 years) with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent LVAD implantation at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they were weaned from the LVAD (group A) or not (group B). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on 24 different factors with a possible influence on myocardial recovery.
RESULTS: In 34 patients, LVAD removal due to myocardial recovery was performed with long-term stable cardiac function (weaning rate, 8.8%). Patients with a pulsatile-flow LVAD had an almost threefold chance for myocardial recovery (odds ratio, 2.719; 95% confidence interval, 1.182 to 6.254) than patients who received continuous-flow devices. Younger patients had significantly higher recovery rates than older patients (odds ratio, 1.036; 95% confidence interval, 1.016 to 1.057).
CONCLUSIONS: Pulsatile-flow LVADs and young age were important factors for myocardial recovery in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients in our analysis. Further studies should investigate whether pulsatility in itself or the different degrees of left ventricular unloading by the two types of systems play a role in myocardial recovery.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444064     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  29 in total

1.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Epidemiology of "Heart Failure with Recovered Ejection Fraction": What do we do After Recovery?

Authors:  Johny S Kuttab; Michael S Kiernan; Amanda R Vest
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-12

3.  Ventricular assist devices: initial orientation.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger; Hitendu Dave; Frithjof Lemme; Olga Romanchenko; Michael Hofmann; Michael Hübler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Shear stress and blood trauma under constant and pulse-modulated speed CF-VAD operations: CFD analysis of the HVAD.

Authors:  Zengsheng Chen; Sofen K Jena; Guruprasad A Giridharan; Michael A Sobieski; Steven C Koenig; Mark S Slaughter; Bartley P Griffith; Zhongjun J Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Temporal pattern of left ventricular structural and functional remodeling following reversal of volume overload heart failure.

Authors:  Kirk R Hutchinson; Anuradha Guggilam; Mary J Cismowski; Maarten L Galantowicz; Thomas A West; James A Stewart; Xiaojin Zhang; Kevin C Lord; Pamela A Lucchesi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-01

6.  Hemodynamic changes during left ventricular assist device-off test correlate with the degree of cardiac fibrosis and predict the outcome after device explantation.

Authors:  Shunsuke Saito; Koichi Toda; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Yasushi Sakata; Isamu Mizote; Takashi Daimon; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Initial report of bridge to recovery in a patient with DuraHeart LVAD.

Authors:  Daisuke Yoshioka; Koichi Toda; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Hiroyuki Nishi; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Shunsuke Saito; Tetsuya Saito; Ikuko Shibasaki; Yasushi Sakata; Tomohito Ohtani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Myocardial Recovery in Patients Receiving Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Results From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).

Authors:  Veli K Topkara; A Reshad Garan; Barry Fine; Amandine F Godier-Furnémont; Alexander Breskin; Barbara Cagliostro; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Donna M Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 8.790

9.  S100A1 in human heart failure: lack of recovery following left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Mosi K Bennett; Wendy E Sweet; Sara Baicker-McKee; Elizabeth Looney; Kristen Karohl; Maria Mountis; W H Wilson Tang; Randall C Starling; Christine S Moravec
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Living Without a Pulse: The Vascular Implications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Suneet N Purohit; William K Cornwell; Jay D Pal; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.