Literature DB >> 25568115

The neural substrate for binaural masking level differences in the auditory cortex.

Heather J Gilbert1, Trevor M Shackleton2, Katrin Krumbholz1, Alan R Palmer1.   

Abstract

The binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is a phenomenon whereby a signal that is identical at each ear (S0), masked by a noise that is identical at each ear (N0), can be made 12-15 dB more detectable by inverting the waveform of either the tone or noise at one ear (Sπ, Nπ). Single-cell responses to BMLD stimuli were measured in the primary auditory cortex of urethane-anesthetized guinea pigs. Firing rate was measured as a function of signal level of a 500 Hz pure tone masked by low-passed white noise. Responses were similar to those reported in the inferior colliculus. At low signal levels, the response was dominated by the masker. At higher signal levels, firing rate either increased or decreased. Detection thresholds for each neuron were determined using signal detection theory. Few neurons yielded measurable detection thresholds for all stimulus conditions, with a wide range in thresholds. However, across the entire population, the lowest thresholds were consistent with human psychophysical BMLDs. As in the inferior colliculus, the shape of the firing-rate versus signal-level functions depended on the neurons' selectivity for interaural time difference. Our results suggest that, in cortex, BMLD signals are detected from increases or decreases in the firing rate, consistent with predictions of cross-correlation models of binaural processing and that the psychophysical detection threshold is based on the lowest neural thresholds across the population.
Copyright © 2015 Gilbert et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMLD; auditory cortex; binaural unmasking; hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25568115      PMCID: PMC4287143          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1131-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Identification and localisation of auditory areas in guinea pig cortex.

Authors:  M N Wallace; R G Rutkowski; A R Palmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  D McAlpine; D Jiang; A R Palmer
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Neural responses in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level differences created by inverting the noise in one ear.

Authors:  A R Palmer; D Jiang; D McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Specialization for sound localization in fields A1, DZ, and PAF of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Chen-Chung Lee; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-21

5.  Rapid spectrotemporal plasticity in primary auditory cortex during behavior.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The anesthetic mechanism of urethane: the effects on neurotransmitter-gated ion channels.

Authors:  Koji Hara; R Adron Harris
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  The ability of inferior colliculus neurons to signal differences in interaural delay.

Authors:  B C Skottun; T M Shackleton; R H Arnott; A R Palmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The acoustical cues to sound location in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Whitney Williams; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory nerve fibre responses in the ferret.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Classification of frequency response areas in the inferior colliculus reveals continua not discrete classes.

Authors:  Alan R Palmer; Trevor M Shackleton; Christian J Sumner; Oliver Zobay; Adrian Rees
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

2.  Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Chandan H Suresh; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Gabriel S Sobczak; Colette M McKay; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression.

Authors:  D H Baker; G Vilidaite; E McClarnon; E Valkova; A Bruno; R E Millman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Semicircular Canals Circumvent Brownian Motion Overload of Mechanoreceptor Hair Cells.

Authors:  Mees Muller; Kier Heeck; Coen P H Elemans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.