Literature DB >> 25566736

[Pupil centroid shift: Marketing tool or essential clinical parameter?].

I Fischinger1, T G Seiler, G Schmidinger, T Seiler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pupil centroid shift (PCS) is an easily measured parameter which is rarely taken into consideration when planning surgery.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the physiological range of PCS and to evaluate its role in refractive and cataract surgery.
METHODS: The pupil center was measured in 103 eyes of 103 patients using the newest PCS module of the Allegro Topolyzer Vario (Version 1.76r58, Wavelight-Alcon, Erlangen, Germany) and the difference between a mesopic and a photopic environment was determined as PCSm. Additionally, these measurements were linearly extrapolated to pupil diameters of 2 mm and 7 mm (photopic-scotopic, PCSe). The statistical analysis included correlations between various demographic and topographic parameters and PCS.
RESULTS: The average (± standard deviation) PCSm was 0.12 ± 0.08 mm with a range of 0.02-0.53 mm, with 2 eyes out of 95 (2%) having a PCSm of more than 0.4 mm. The extrapolated PCSe was 0.24 ± 0.16 mm and ranged from 0.03 to 0.78 mm, with 14 eyes out of 95 (15%) having a PCSe of more than 0.4 mm. Of the 95 eyes 3 (3%) showed a PCSe of more than 0.7 mm. There was no correlation between PCS with any of the demographic parameters tested.
CONCLUSION: Up to 15% of the patients showed a PCS of more than 0.4 mm which requires a decision of the (refractive) ophthalmic surgeon as to whether the optical zone should be centered on the photopic or mesopic/scotopic pupil center. In the 3% of patients with a PCSe value greater than 0.7 mm, the implantation of multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25566736     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-014-3170-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  22 in total

1.  Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

Authors:  Yabo Yang; Keith Thompson; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Pupil diameter and the principal ray.

Authors:  A M Fay; S L Trokel; J A Myers
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Effect of decentration on the optical performance in multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Mitsutaka Soda; Shigeo Yaguchi
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Measurement of the spatial shift of the pupil center.

Authors:  Massimo Camellin; Federico Gambino; Stefano Casaro
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Maximum permissible lateral decentration in aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided corneal ablation.

Authors:  Michael Bueeler; Michael Mrochen; Theo Seiler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Pupil center shift relative to the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex under natural and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

Authors:  Uzeyir Erdem; Orkun Muftuoglu; Fatih Cakir Gundogan; Gungor Sobaci; Atilla Bayer
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Calculation of the influence of lateral chromatic aberration on image quality across the visual field.

Authors:  L N Thibos
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Centering corneal surgical procedures.

Authors:  H Uozato; D L Guyton
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Corneal topography of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Optical zone centration analysis. Summit Photorefractive Keratectomy Topography Study Group.

Authors:  B H Schwartz-Goldstein; P S Hersh
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Changes in pupil size and centroid shift in eyes with uncomplicated in-the-bag IOL implantation.

Authors:  Gungor Sobaci; Uzeyir Erdem; Yusuf Uysal; Orkun Muftuoglu
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictive factors for photic phenomena after refractive, rotationally asymmetric, multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Hungwon Tchah; Kiyeun Nam; Aeri Yoo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Impact of light conditions on reading ability following multifocal pseudophakic corrections.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Panagiota Ntonti; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Maria Gkika; Doukas Dardabounis; Irfan Perente; Haris Sideroudi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.